Former Jets' and Bills' TE Tyler Kroft reached agreement on. A one-year deal with the SF 49ers, per his agent @MikeMcCartney7.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) May 23, 2022
There are 140 users in the forums
49ers sign TE Tyler Kroft
May 23, 2022 at 7:02 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 110,970
May 23, 2022 at 7:06 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
[ Edited by NCommand on May 23, 2022 at 7:11 AM ]
May 23, 2022 at 7:12 AM
- NinerBuff
- The Election Dude
- Posts: 21,443
I guess the Fumigator didn't last long? 
May 23, 2022 at 7:15 AM
- mayo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 64,320
Championship. 
May 23, 2022 at 7:18 AM
- illinois9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,145
I actually like this dude
May 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by NinerBuff:
I guess the Fumigator didn't last long?
Yeah, somebody has to be cut.
May 23, 2022 at 7:44 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 110,970
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
May 23, 2022 at 8:38 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
May 23, 2022 at 8:52 AM
- 9erred
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,171
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
It seems odd to me to have so many camp fodders. I guess they truly want Woerner to claim the number 2 and he has 5 competitors now. I personally have a fondness for Troy Fumagali ove rDwelley
May 23, 2022 at 9:09 AM
- thl408
- Moderator
- Posts: 33,070
Originally posted by 9erred:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
It seems odd to me to have so many camp fodders. I guess they truly want Woerner to claim the number 2 and he has 5 competitors now. I personally have a fondness for Troy Fumagali ove rDwelley
Is this guy a highly rated run blocker?
I think these two recent TE signings are a sign they aren't content with either Dwelley or Woerner. Or perhaps they want Kittle playing zero snaps in the preseason.
May 23, 2022 at 9:17 AM
- Sickaa
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,799
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by 9erred:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
It seems odd to me to have so many camp fodders. I guess they truly want Woerner to claim the number 2 and he has 5 competitors now. I personally have a fondness for Troy Fumagali ove rDwelley
Is this guy a highly rated run blocker?
I think these two recent TE signings are a sign they aren't content with either Dwelley or Woerner. Or perhaps they want Kittle playing zero snaps in the preseason.
Or, they're gonna go crazy with running the ball this season.
May 23, 2022 at 10:35 AM
- AB81Rules
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,111
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
I have to think either Matthews or Hudson get cut to make room, neither have a chance of making the team IMO.
May 23, 2022 at 10:37 AM
- Willisfn4life
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,131
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by 9erred:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
It seems odd to me to have so many camp fodders. I guess they truly want Woerner to claim the number 2 and he has 5 competitors now. I personally have a fondness for Troy Fumagali ove rDwelley
Is this guy a highly rated run blocker?
I think these two recent TE signings are a sign they aren't content with either Dwelley or Woerner. Or perhaps they want Kittle playing zero snaps in the preseason.
I don't know much about him but I found something written on him a year ago. These numbers do not include this past season obviously but yeah he seems to be primarily a blocker with some receiving ability
https://www.google.com/amp/s/jetsxfactor.com/2021/03/20/analyzing-new-york-jets-te-tyler-krofts-strengths-and-weaknesses/amp/
My opinion is that this move is more about competition for the third tight end spot on the roster. Woerner showed a ton of growth from year 1 to year 2 as a blocker and put together a really nice season from that standpoint. I think he's probably still locked into that number 2 spot
[ Edited by Willisfn4life on May 23, 2022 at 10:49 AM ]
May 23, 2022 at 10:42 AM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
I have to think either Matthews or Hudson get cut to make room, neither have a chance of making the team IMO.
Yeah, I was wondering who might be cut.
May 23, 2022 at 11:03 AM
- AB81Rules
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,111
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You can never have too many running blocking TE's???
363 snaps...similar to Charlie Woerner as a run blocker.
Seems redundant.
Got a yr in the scheme in NY under Saleh and Co. over half those snaps were as a receiver according to PFF. No idea what his numbers were with the Bills as far as running routes/per snap. I know his last yr in Cinn he was used in the passing game as well.
SF needs bodies at TE through OTAs/TC. I'm guessing this is one of those post 51 signings where he won't count much (if at all) against the cap.
He had 16 catches for 173 yards last year. Hardly a pass catching target. But maybe they see more potential there. No issues with the pickup. I think we're OK on camp bodies now.
TE: George Kittle; Charlie Woerner, Ross Dwelley, Jordan Matthews, Tanner Hudson, Troy Fumagalli & Tyler Kroft
I have to think either Matthews or Hudson get cut to make room, neither have a chance of making the team IMO.
Yeah, I was wondering who might be cut.
Yeah, can't see them bringing 7 TEs into camp, and going lighter somewhere else.