2022 49ers Training Camp Thread

Originally posted by Ghostofabshelmet:

From what I'm hearing Lance's passes have been incredibly on target but the defense are taking advantage of a lesser WR corps without Deebo or that Lance is being sacked by the DL before he can even set to throw. The pitfalls of having most of your starting OL not there.

— Rich (@richjmadrid) July 29, 2022

Originally posted by Bloodless:
Might make some people feel a little better about our oline so I am posting it lol.

Make it a would've been another sack but Stafford got rid of it right after. That's 3 sacks to my count, and Donald isn't on the field which should be alarming https://t.co/Jh6Y13UykR

— Marco Martinez (@Marco_Mart1205) July 29, 2022

Yeah this rams OL is struggling. If 49ers fans thought our OL was bad this Rams OL Is worse!

— Marco Martinez (@Marco_Mart1205) July 29, 2022

Originally posted by Sickaa:
Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Ghostofabshelmet:

From what I'm hearing Lance's passes have been incredibly on target but the defense are taking advantage of a lesser WR corps without Deebo or that Lance is being sacked by the DL before he can even set to throw. The pitfalls of having most of your starting OL not there.

— Rich (@richjmadrid) July 29, 2022

What is our "starting lineup" though? LOL

Originally posted by Bluesbro:

Originally posted by Sickaa:
Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

The OL needs to be a strong run blocking unit more than pass pro. Wait til they go full practice and preseason to see how that develops. A strong run game will be Lance's best friend.

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by HitMan52:
Sounds to me the real problem is the O-Line. Even on the good plays it has been known they were made after a sack. But for some reason they don't want to invest high draft capital on the interior except for one 2nd round pick

Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by HitMan52:
Sounds to me the real problem is the O-Line. Even on the good plays it has been known they were made after a sack. But for some reason they don't want to invest high draft capital on the interior except for one 2nd round pick

Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

BTW, anyone know anything about the new DL we just brought in?

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by HitMan52:
Sounds to me the real problem is the O-Line. Even on the good plays it has been known they were made after a sack. But for some reason they don't want to invest high draft capital on the interior except for one 2nd round pick

Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

BTW, anyone know anything about the new DL we just brought in?

Have we signed another DL?

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by HitMan52:
Sounds to me the real problem is the O-Line. Even on the good plays it has been known they were made after a sack. But for some reason they don't want to invest high draft capital on the interior except for one 2nd round pick

Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

BTW, anyone know anything about the new DL we just brought in?

Have we signed another DL?

Of course. It's a Friday.

Tomasi Laulile

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Ghostofabshelmet:

From what I'm hearing Lance's passes have been incredibly on target but the defense are taking advantage of a lesser WR corps without Deebo or that Lance is being sacked by the DL before he can even set to throw. The pitfalls of having most of your starting OL not there.

— Rich (@richjmadrid) July 29, 2022

What is our "starting lineup" though? LOL

I'm not sure even the coaches know that as of now lol

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Sickaa:

Originally posted by HitMan52:
Sounds to me the real problem is the O-Line. Even on the good plays it has been known they were made after a sack. But for some reason they don't want to invest high draft capital on the interior except for one 2nd round pick

Agreed.

The OL, was, Is, and will always be a problem, untill the front office decides to address It the same way they have regarding the DL.

BTW, anyone know anything about the new DL we just brought in?

Have we signed another DL?

Of course. It's a Friday.

Tomasi Laulile

Lol Damn. Lynch has some Weird addiction with DL.

I need to check this guy out. Hopefully not an Injury prone signing.