There are 257 users in the forums
Originally posted by ajsjohnson:
But WHO would get traded that could recoup more than a day 3 pick?
Originally posted by ajsjohnson:
Confusing. The team needs O-linemen way more than CMC. Much different from Rams moves, which addressed the 2 most impactful (and why I preferred Burns to CMC) positions in football and added a great WR to boot. Still, I of course pray that this actually moves the needle for the offense in a way I don't anticipate, but it is telling that the Super Bowl champs and probable future SB champs Bills/Chiefs didn't think it was worth adding him at that price. The Rams really could've used him, and he would be a game changer for both the Bills/Chiefs with their mediocre running games. That said, I hope this catapults us to a championship--Go Niners!
Originally posted by NYniner85:
See ya later 2023 draft lol. Told ya it wasn't gonna be a 3rd and nothing much else
Originally posted by 9ers4u:Originally posted by NYniner85:See ya later 2023 draft lol. Told ya it wasn't gonna be a 3rd and nothing much else
For a 🏆 F**k the draft picks
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Oh and not once in six years has kyle integrated the short backfield pass game into his offense. He sends backs out for surprise high risk chunk plays down field. He's not gonna start building a 6 - 8 yard game now.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Hes had 8 fumbles in about 130p carries + receptions. That's pretty good.
Saw your other post about not being able to afford him. He's dirt cheap this yr and I'm gonna go ahead and say he restructures his contract (more GTD $) which can lower is cap hit and push stuff down the road.
benefits of having a rookie QB contract.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:Oh and not once in six years has kyle integrated the short backfield pass game into his offense. He sends backs out for surprise high risk chunk plays down field. He's not gonna start building a 6 - 8 yard game now.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Fresh49:
Trade makes sense but that was a lot of picks, Idk if we have others to replace those we lost, if so, fine. The money isnt too bad, plus he's on a team friendly deal, which is good too.
My only concern is its another injury prone guy added to the bunch. I also wondered prior were there any decent Olinemen available to trade for, but oh well, hope it all ends favorably for us in the end.
It is a lot of picks. Hopefully a low 2nd (that was the only pick I didn't want to move)
we still have a 3rd and I'm guessing we will get another if Ryans becomes a HC.
won't be shocked if we try to move someone before the deadline.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Oh and not once in six years has kyle integrated the short backfield pass game into his offense. He sends backs out for surprise high risk chunk plays down field. He's not gonna start building a 6 - 8 yard game now.
Did you watch him in Atlanta?
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Jimmy not costing us very much either. I wouldnt be dreaming about trey anytime soon. Trey will be our qb if we cant extend bosa.
Speaking of bosa, if im nick im wondering these guys don't seem interested in paying me. Cmc is gonna eat up 10m in cap next year if he stays. Am i gonna haggle like a bum for half smoked cigarettes to get a paraag cheapskate contract?
I don't see how this move leads to a sustainable championship locker room from a budgetary perspective.
It also goes against kyle rb by committee approach and makes our play calling more predictable. Another superstar snap quota to fill. This is a fantasy football move not a real football move.
We gave up picks we could have used to draft iol. Forget about dynasty just trying to make a splash in 2022
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Oh and not once in six years has kyle integrated the short backfield pass game into his offense. He sends backs out for surprise high risk chunk plays down field. He's not gonna start building a 6 - 8 yard game now.
Did you watch him in Atlanta?
Are you watching him here?
Originally posted by Dshearn:
unless i am wrong,
49ers are around 5 million of the cap invested in RBs yesterday.
If they cut Coleman, that is @4 million (yesterday).
When Mitchell comes back if they cut another back without trading for CMC then it is down to @3 million.
in the short term if they roster Mitchell, TDP and CMC that puts the RBs @14 million. Bears are @ 19m , Dallas @ 18m, and saints @17m for comparison.
Not drafting those 4 traded picks amounts to @ 4 million in cap savings. (yes it gets murky with young guys being cheaper then the guys they are replacing).
You replace those 4 guys with 6/7th round guys or Rookie Free agents and it nets you @ 3 million in savings.
CMC's worst contract year was @12 million on the 49ers books from what was posted, but really without the salary cap impact from the picks, and the loss of at least 1 RB not being carried by the team going forward and that 12 million is really 7/8 million.
It really is not a bad value for a guy who has superstar potential, with a skill set that should really age well (rare for RBs).
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Oh and not once in six years has kyle integrated the short backfield pass game into his offense. He sends backs out for surprise high risk chunk plays down field. He's not gonna start building a 6 - 8 yard game now.
Did you watch him in Atlanta?
Are you watching him here?
Yep and when Kyle had a good receiver out of the backfield Jet McKinnon he threw the ball to him quite a bit. But you mad cause instead of forcing a passing game to Jeff Wilson (who's signature play is a passing play) he decides to design plays for Deebo.