Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by dj43:like i said, you just don't get it. There is a difference from an 8 man box vs an 8 man box selling out to stop the run
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NYniner85:dj just doesn't get it. We would need to run a goaline type offense to counter the stacks on Defense.. like what Atl did to us
Originally posted by dj43:
I'm going to stay on my soapbox about OL, particularly IOL, here in evaluating the running game.
We all see Nick Chubb at the top of the charts in RBs. What gets overlooked is the incredible OL he gets to run behind. The IOL is on another planet.
Eric Pocic at center is tied for the #3 overall spot with an RBK rating of 73.4. Joe Bitonio is # the 1 overall guard. RBK of 81.5! Wyatt Teller is tied for #2. RBK = 88.2! Tops in the league. The OTs are not quite at that level but are good. 63.1 for Conklin and 78.8 for Hudson.
So, of course, Chubb is going to roll up some awesome numbers. He has the best group in the league to run behind.
Now for those who believe it takes the threat of a very good passing QB in order to run the ball well, Jacoby Brissett has a very average passing rating of 69 compared to Jimmy Garoppolo's 66.7.
Conclusion: If you want to run the ball better, put a better run-blocking OL group upfront and you will run it better.
Of course, the comparative weakness of the OL is not news. We spent the entire offseason lamenting exactly that as being the biggest weakness on the team.
Agreed also having to face some of the most stacked boxes across the league v doesn't help. It's every yr. QB play matters there, not saying Jimmy isn't it paying okay but teams still don't respect the passing game the way they should.
The issue centers around your consistent unwillingness to move off your constant attacks on Garoppolo and recognize that bringing in CMC will not change the fact that the drop in the running game is based far more on the identifiable drop in quality of the run blocking by the realigned IOL than it is on QB play.
We have the same QB this year that we had last year at the same time but were running the ball better.
I noted that Cleveland has a much less effective passing game than SF, however, due to the high quality of their OL they are running the ball well despite constantly facing 8-in-the-box. Yet, you ignore that data completely.
I get it. I have seen it for a long time. You choose to focus only on the QB and ignore all other causes. So, let's move on. This theme has circled back to the starting point.
yes, We faced the 8 man box last year, but no one sold out on the run so dramatically until we faced the Rams the 3rd time (2019 SB also). Since then, a lot teams who could, have done the same thing. Its the very reason we have been passing more. we have to take advantage of the mismatches now in the secondary. Once we start completing more it will open up the Run game.. When this happens, it won't be magic that our Run Blocking starts to get better
We are 7th in the league in passing (last i checked) so it hasn't been terrible, is that by necessity? Probably but still not terrible. Jimmy, the Oline and receivers could all play better for sure but all the numbers I look at keep pointing directly towards the person running the ball so far this season.