CMC, Elite RB who will start!

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 4thN9ne:
Does Wilson give up the number? Does CMC try to start with something new with a new number

#23

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by cortana49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I knew you were gonna pick out that wilson play. Great moment. My point is that a play like that is less likely to happen cuz its "key on me" cmc not mr nobody jeff wilson. Having another fantasy all pro makes it less likely to call plays for unattended unknown players.

The trade is done. Well see what happens.

Huh? So what teams weren't keying on CMC in NC? Cool key on him and leave Deebo/Kittle/BA. Kyle can and will scheme up CMC vs a LBer which is a massive advantage. Go re-read what they were doing in camp with the Jet. Now add steroids to it.

I don't think people are able to envision what having CMC will do for the offense …even when HE DOESN'T GET THE BALL!

Yup. Someone just posted his offense makes average running backs lol great but good ones look bad... make it make sense!!!

Originally posted by Rathof44:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:

Originally posted by cortana49:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I knew you were gonna pick out that wilson play. Great moment. My point is that a play like that is less likely to happen cuz its "key on me" cmc not mr nobody jeff wilson. Having another fantasy all pro makes it less likely to call plays for unattended unknown players.

The trade is done. Well see what happens.

Huh? So what teams weren't keying on CMC in NC? Cool key on him and leave Deebo/Kittle/BA. Kyle can and will scheme up CMC vs a LBer which is a massive advantage. Go re-read what they were doing in camp with the Jet. Now add steroids to it.

I don't think people are able to envision what having CMC will do for the offense …even when HE DOESN'T GET THE BALL!

Yup. Someone just posted his offense makes average running backs lol great but good ones look bad... make it make sense!!!

Wait. This team has had a great RB since Gore left? Who did I miss?

Originally posted by evil:
He could go back to #5

Originally posted by eric_anthony:

Originally posted by evil:
He could go back to #5

Lance is 5

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Exactly

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
I hope he goes 1 or 99.. 22 would be fine as well we could boot Wilson.. sorry Wilson but I really did not like your game killing fumbles

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
You didn't exactly say it, but your five pages in the Carolina fire sale thread of why we shouldn't get CMC because Wilson is doing whatever is saying it

all good glad you changed direction and not like some others here who hate it because they don't know s**t

I never once said it and I went out of my way to say Wilson was NOT better multiple times. There's no reason to post what you did when it simply wasn't true.

yes Wilson was avging almost 5 yards per carry. We stopped running the ball in the ATL game because we got down quickly (and ATL's pass D blows). Mitchell is a damn good back all the same….that said CMC is on a different level. Especially as a receiver.

Stop, your posts were all about staying with Wilson and CMC wasn't worth it

Originally posted by mitpdub:

Originally posted by FredFlintstone:

Originally posted by Rathof44:
49er fan: "We never sign anyone good, all the other teams getting the good players"
Also 49er fan: "What? Christian McCaffery sucks. why do we trade for these guys?"

Lol seriously it's just hilarious in here. We gave up all those picks!? Then come draft day after being mad all winter because the offense struggled and seeing LA with him why did we draft this guy or that guy!?

Would you give up Kinlaw, Trey Sermon, and Dante Pettis for CMC ? If the answer is an easy yes then those are 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks we busted on these past few years. And those guys actually got play time.