-
NCommand
- Hall of Fame
-
- Posts: 123,365
Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
Originally posted by socal1632:
We aren't beating the Rams twice. 35-17 Rams. Our usual Jimmy2picksNFgFest.
Well we've beat them 7 times in a row in the regular season so.....
Kyle was 7-0 on the East Coast. Now he's 7-1.
Kyle's 7-0 in the regular season against the Rams. Now he's....
-
elguapo
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 25,468
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
All these f**kin injuries!!!! Key injuries too!!! Gonna f**kin suck of Deebo doesn't play!!!
The Rams always play us when we have key players out and we still beat the s**t out of them. However this is too much to overcome. It's better to be lucky than good and this could cost us our season if we lose this game because of injuries which it's looking like we might
So out:
DT1
DT2
LB2
LB3
CB2
FB
Possibly WR1 and WR3
Rams…….a below average Guard and average LT
[ Edited by elguapo on Oct 27, 2022 at 2:08 PM ]
-
boast
- Hella Fame
-
- Posts: 151,777
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
they'll have no answer for CMC imo
-
49AllTheTime
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 68,583
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
we can still win and easily on offense. just don't force the ball and take what they give...and they give a lot
but the defense is another story
[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Oct 27, 2022 at 2:10 PM ]
-
pasodoc9er
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 21,030
- NFL Pick 'em
Just a question re: injuries…should we be playing guys who have just gotten off injured list, but then we find out they are playing at somewhere between 80-90%, and depending on the player, maybe less than 80%? It obviously varies player to player, but overall, if we have a guy come back from PUP and he goes out and obviously is playing well below his norm, it sure seems like a better bet to go with the 2nd string /rotational player rather than the still injured one. Yet that isn't what has been happening. LT got beaten cleanly a couple times, and when healthy that never happens. RT, was like a re-emergence of Kwame , the original swinging door. At CB we saw similar ineptitude in coverage, again from guys injured, trying to play when they weren't ready yet.
Not sure of the answer, but having injured guys playing instead of their healthy backups, does not seem to have worked well for us.
I understand guys like Trent, who will do anything to help the team win. But it seems that kyle needs to recognize when when an injured guy who comes back and plays poorly, that a healthy, but less talented replacement would be a better choice.
-
Tman
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 13,542
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
we can still win and easily on offense. just don't force the ball and take what they give...and they give a lot
but the defense is another story
Luckily the rams play right into our Ds strengths, a pass happy offense with a statue qb and lackluster running game.
That being said I expect this to be a very competitive game
-
DonnieDarko
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 63,957
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
they'll have no answer for CMC imo
he'll basically need to make up for all the yards that deebo produces. maybe some routes out of the slot
-
DonnieDarko
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 63,957
Originally posted by Tman:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
we can still win and easily on offense. just don't force the ball and take what they give...and they give a lot
but the defense is another story
Luckily the rams play right into our Ds strengths, a pass happy offense with a statue qb and lackluster running game.
That being said I expect this to be a very competitive game
i assume they'll do exactly what KC did early on to test us. gotta make em pay if they blitz
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
Why was Deebo along with the starting offense still in the game late in the 4th?!
-
da209
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,258
Originally posted by pasodoc9er:
Just a question re: injuries…should we be playing guys who have just gotten off injured list, but then we find out they are playing at somewhere between 80-90%, and depending on the player, maybe less than 80%? It obviously varies player to player, but overall, if we have a guy come back from PUP and he goes out and obviously is playing well below his norm, it sure seems like a better bet to go with the 2nd string /rotational player rather than the still injured one. Yet that isn't what has been happening. LT got beaten cleanly a couple times, and when healthy that never happens. RT, was like a re-emergence of Kwame , the original swinging door. At CB we saw similar ineptitude in coverage, again from guys injured, trying to play when they weren't ready yet.
Not sure of the answer, but having injured guys playing instead of their healthy backups, does not seem to have worked well for us.
I understand guys like Trent, who will do anything to help the team win. But it seems that kyle needs to recognize when when an injured guy who comes back and plays poorly, that a healthy, but less talented replacement would be a better choice.
i noticed this as well. Seem like
our couching staff expects them to play hurt even if they are not 100. I'd rather go with healthy player and let the injured player recover so they don't miss additional time.
-
boast
- Hella Fame
-
- Posts: 151,777
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
no deebo no win
Why was Deebo along with the starting offense still in the game late in the 4th?!
he didnt report his hammy until the next day