week 10 vs LA Chargers Coaches Film Analysis

Awesome breakdown. Very encouraging... it doesn't sound like there was any systemically problematic issues... just... really, need to execute better. That in itself is correctible and something that I know the staff/players will continue working on.
Because it's true... While there were plays that had missed opportunities, there were also a number of good plays where they DID execute well and we gashed the defense for 8, 9 rushing yards at a time. And ultimately, that was the gameplan was to attack with the run game because the Chargers were banged up in their front 7 and have a great secondary.

A question I have, Jonny!
What kind of new wrinkles are we seeing with the addition of CMC? From what I could see, it seems like there's not too much change scheme-wise... but CMC & Deebo have a Steph Curry-like effect where defenders' attention just gravitates to their motion. And then, plays like a deep corner route of the backfield just seem much more viable because of who CMC & Deebo are.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Tonight at 4 PM PST I'm gonna be on Waynebreezies show and I'm gonna cover 4 big time misses in the run game. 3 could've been huge explosives for TD's on drives that ended in punts.

Right, let's blame the player execution on the field on KS's playcalling some more especially after a bye week hangover 🤣

Ummmmm I'm not blaming Kyle at all....

What do you think of Kyle's play designs; pass and run, playcalling sequence, philosophy, predictability, etc.? I know it is a loaded question but any feedback would be much appreciated.

I've just decided I'm gonna push out a shorter video tomorrow covering 3 big missed explosive runs. We had all the defenders accounted for, just missed blocks. Could've been 37-16, easily. I don't think play-calling is the issue.

Saw if Brendel picks up/doesn't whiff on 2 blocks, we get 145 more rushing yards and 2 TD's. Not even joking.

Wow! Cannot wait to watch your breakdown on those 3 plays.

I heard John Chapman say that MM whiffed on a couple blocks as well. Including one near the goal line that got stuffed in the backfield.

Originally posted by Wubbie:
Awesome breakdown. Very encouraging... it doesn't sound like there was any systemically problematic issues... just... really, need to execute better. That in itself is correctible and something that I know the staff/players will continue working on.
Because it's true... While there were plays that had missed opportunities, there were also a number of good plays where they DID execute well and we gashed the defense for 8, 9 rushing yards at a time. And ultimately, that was the gameplan was to attack with the run game because the Chargers were banged up in their front 7 and have a great secondary.

A question I have, Jonny!
What kind of new wrinkles are we seeing with the addition of CMC? From what I could see, it seems like there's not too much change scheme-wise... but CMC & Deebo have a Steph Curry-like effect where defenders' attention just gravitates to their motion. And then, plays like a deep corner route of the backfield just seem much more viable because of who CMC & Deebo are.

Yeah I don't really see anything new/different with CMC it's just the skillset he brings to the table. He's the most complete back in the league, explosive, is the ultimate swiss army knife.

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by Wubbie:
Awesome breakdown. Very encouraging... it doesn't sound like there was any systemically problematic issues... just... really, need to execute better. That in itself is correctible and something that I know the staff/players will continue working on.
Because it's true... While there were plays that had missed opportunities, there were also a number of good plays where they DID execute well and we gashed the defense for 8, 9 rushing yards at a time. And ultimately, that was the gameplan was to attack with the run game because the Chargers were banged up in their front 7 and have a great secondary.

A question I have, Jonny!
What kind of new wrinkles are we seeing with the addition of CMC? From what I could see, it seems like there's not too much change scheme-wise... but CMC & Deebo have a Steph Curry-like effect where defenders' attention just gravitates to their motion. And then, plays like a deep corner route of the backfield just seem much more viable because of who CMC & Deebo are.

Yeah I don't really see anything new/different with CMC it's just the skillset he brings to the table. He's the most complete back in the league, explosive, is the ultimate swiss army knife.

Yeah. Feels like biggest effects will be (1) defenders will gravitate toward him, (2) Jimmy will be more likely to just hit his checkdown, and (3) CMC is just an upgrade in most things that we ask our RB's to do.

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Yeah I don't really see anything new/different with CMC it's just the skillset he brings to the table. He's the most complete back in the league, explosive, is the ultimate swiss army knife.

CMC is 92/100, 98 on rare occasions, CMC is probably one of the best pass catching RB in the NFL too.
And it's great to have Mitchell as the other RB, if they key on CMC or CMC needs a break, Mitchell benefits.

BRENDEL !!!!

Originally posted by picklejuice:
BRENDEL !!!!

?

watching jonnydel break things down on WayneBreezie's youtube live, and he's showing how if jake brendel makes a block we get explosive plays...

lol

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by picklejuice:
BRENDEL !!!!

?

Even if Brendl?

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Tonight at 4 PM PST I'm gonna be on Waynebreezies show and I'm gonna cover 4 big time misses in the run game. 3 could've been huge explosives for TD's on drives that ended in punts.

Right, let's blame the player execution on the field on KS's playcalling some more especially after a bye week hangover 🤣

Ummmmm I'm not blaming Kyle at all....

What do you think of Kyle's play designs; pass and run, playcalling sequence, philosophy, predictability, etc.? I know it is a loaded question but any feedback would be much appreciated.

I've just decided I'm gonna push out a shorter video tomorrow covering 3 big missed explosive runs. We had all the defenders accounted for, just missed blocks. Could've been 37-16, easily. I don't think play-calling is the issue.

Saw if Brendel picks up/doesn't whiff on 2 blocks, we get 145 more rushing yards and 2 TD's. Not even joking.

I do for the very reason you're highlighting...every single intricate part needs to be perfect in a run centric game plan like that or you end up down late in the 4Q and in many 3 and longs with no room for error for a W. And this is AFTER two weeks of preparation and coming in 24th in running DVOA. Meaning, you're playing to your weakness with a "no matter what" mentality. Could we have scored 30? Sure...if every little thing was perfectly executed. But that's not even remotely realistic.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Tonight at 4 PM PST I'm gonna be on Waynebreezies show and I'm gonna cover 4 big time misses in the run game. 3 could've been huge explosives for TD's on drives that ended in punts.

Right, let's blame the player execution on the field on KS's playcalling some more especially after a bye week hangover 🤣

Ummmmm I'm not blaming Kyle at all....

What do you think of Kyle's play designs; pass and run, playcalling sequence, philosophy, predictability, etc.? I know it is a loaded question but any feedback would be much appreciated.

I've just decided I'm gonna push out a shorter video tomorrow covering 3 big missed explosive runs. We had all the defenders accounted for, just missed blocks. Could've been 37-16, easily. I don't think play-calling is the issue.

Saw if Brendel picks up/doesn't whiff on 2 blocks, we get 145 more rushing yards and 2 TD's. Not even joking.

I do for the very reason you're highlighting...every single intricate part needs to be perfect in a run centric game plan like that or you end up down late in the 4Q and in many 3 and longs with no room for error for a W. And this is AFTER two weeks of preparation and coming in 24th in running DVOA. Meaning, you're playing to your weakness with a "no matter what" mentality. Could we have scored 30? Sure...if every little thing was perfectly executed. But that's not even remotely realistic.

It's not even if, "every little thing" is done perfectly. We're talking a wide zone that has been in the league for 30 years. Vince Lombardi was running zone blocks in the 60's with, 'do-dad' blocks. We're literally 2 Jake Brendel blocks away from huge explosives. It's there. I don't blame Kyle for going back to it, cause if you get those blocks you're off to the races.

We're in his 6th season, why should he abandon what he's built the team on for 6 years? That'd be like expecting Harbaugh to go to a spread passing team. We tried that in 2014 and it didn't work out well.

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Tonight at 4 PM PST I'm gonna be on Waynebreezies show and I'm gonna cover 4 big time misses in the run game. 3 could've been huge explosives for TD's on drives that ended in punts.

Right, let's blame the player execution on the field on KS's playcalling some more especially after a bye week hangover 🤣

Ummmmm I'm not blaming Kyle at all....

What do you think of Kyle's play designs; pass and run, playcalling sequence, philosophy, predictability, etc.? I know it is a loaded question but any feedback would be much appreciated.

I've just decided I'm gonna push out a shorter video tomorrow covering 3 big missed explosive runs. We had all the defenders accounted for, just missed blocks. Could've been 37-16, easily. I don't think play-calling is the issue.

Saw if Brendel picks up/doesn't whiff on 2 blocks, we get 145 more rushing yards and 2 TD's. Not even joking.

I do for the very reason you're highlighting...every single intricate part needs to be perfect in a run centric game plan like that or you end up down late in the 4Q and in many 3 and longs with no room for error for a W. And this is AFTER two weeks of preparation and coming in 24th in running DVOA. Meaning, you're playing to your weakness with a "no matter what" mentality. Could we have scored 30? Sure...if every little thing was perfectly executed. But that's not even remotely realistic.

It's not even if, "every little thing" is done perfectly. We're talking a wide zone that has been in the league for 30 years. Vince Lombardi was running zone blocks in the 60's with, 'do-dad' blocks. We're literally 2 Jake Brendel blocks away from huge explosives. It's there. I don't blame Kyle for going back to it, cause if you get those blocks you're off to the races.

We're in his 6th season, why should he abandon what he's built the team on for 6 years? That'd be like expecting Harbaugh to go to a spread passing team. We tried that in 2014 and it didn't work out well.

Right, BUT Brendel is part of why they were 24th in running DVOA to begin with. So why would you expect anything less? If it's not him, it's MM, or Deebo, or Kittle, TW, etc. missing an angle, getting blown back or completely whiffing.

It's the responsibility of the OC to know his teams strengths/weaknesses and cater to those.

Right now, this is not a strong running team. It's a team that's much better in pass protection with far more weapons than Kyle's had his entire career on one team.

PS: That doesn't mean you should fully abandon the run game and stop trying to hit explosives off it. Just better balance.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by jonnydel:

Originally posted by ChillninDaBay:

Originally posted by jonnydel:
Tonight at 4 PM PST I'm gonna be on Waynebreezies show and I'm gonna cover 4 big time misses in the run game. 3 could've been huge explosives for TD's on drives that ended in punts.

Right, let's blame the player execution on the field on KS's playcalling some more especially after a bye week hangover 🤣

Ummmmm I'm not blaming Kyle at all....

What do you think of Kyle's play designs; pass and run, playcalling sequence, philosophy, predictability, etc.? I know it is a loaded question but any feedback would be much appreciated.

I've just decided I'm gonna push out a shorter video tomorrow covering 3 big missed explosive runs. We had all the defenders accounted for, just missed blocks. Could've been 37-16, easily. I don't think play-calling is the issue.

Saw if Brendel picks up/doesn't whiff on 2 blocks, we get 145 more rushing yards and 2 TD's. Not even joking.

I do for the very reason you're highlighting...every single intricate part needs to be perfect in a run centric game plan like that or you end up down late in the 4Q and in many 3 and longs with no room for error for a W. And this is AFTER two weeks of preparation and coming in 24th in running DVOA. Meaning, you're playing to your weakness with a "no matter what" mentality. Could we have scored 30? Sure...if every little thing was perfectly executed. But that's not even remotely realistic.

It's not even if, "every little thing" is done perfectly. We're talking a wide zone that has been in the league for 30 years. Vince Lombardi was running zone blocks in the 60's with, 'do-dad' blocks. We're literally 2 Jake Brendel blocks away from huge explosives. It's there. I don't blame Kyle for going back to it, cause if you get those blocks you're off to the races.

We're in his 6th season, why should he abandon what he's built the team on for 6 years? That'd be like expecting Harbaugh to go to a spread passing team. We tried that in 2014 and it didn't work out well.

Right, BUT Brendel is part of why they were 24th in running DVOA to begin with. So why would you expect anything less? If it's not him, it's MM, or Deebo, or Kittle, TW, etc. missing an angle, getting blown back or completely whiffing.

It's the responsibility of the OC to know his teams strengths/weaknesses and cater to those.

Right now, this is not a strong running team. It's a team that's much better in pass protection with far more weapons than Kyle's had his entire career on one team.

PS: That doesn't mean you should fully abandon the run game and stop trying to hit explosives off it. Just better balance.

I think after Week 3 since we got CMC the running DVOA is actually in top 10 if not mistaken.