There are 345 users in the forums

Are Wins a QB stat?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Are Wins a QB stat?

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by boast:
i believe the debate was "are Wins a QB stat"

the NFL record book appears to prove that they are a QB stat.

Thanks, edited.

If we acknowledge they are an official stat kept by the NFL why is this even an open question for debate? It's settled.
a coffee table book is not official. if it was official it would be on the site..there is a reason why they don't include it

a coffee table book hahahahah. it's a PDF. the NFL made it easily searchable posting it that way.

and it's on the NFL site. and even more specifically it's the operations.nfl.com site.

https://operations.nfl.com/updates/the-game/2022-nfl-record-and-fact-book/
it's a kids book.. there is a reason why you have to download it . parody

you really have no idea what youre talking about. it's downloadable because it's over 700 pages.
no idea about what.. your statement doesn't help you one bit

you cant even keep your opinion straight. first it was coffee table book then it was a kids book. youve lost the plot completely.
this maybe be the most ignorant post here, since when is giving multiple descriptions make it any less lol

the irony of calling someone else's post ignorant.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Who would you all think the top pure pocket passers are in the NFL today?

You would have to define pure pocket passer. I see a potential 100+ page debate here
Please continue..

I am asking because some folks are under the impression that Jimmy is a pure pocket passer that needs elite pass protection to be successful. If I have a few other QB's similar to Jimmy (pure pocket passer) that I can compare pressure stats with to confirm that pure pocket passers do indeed have more trouble against pressure than say the more athletic QB's.

How about QB's who have played in 12 or more games that have less than 100 yards rushing and have averaged less than 3.0 YPC?
[ Edited by YACBros85 on Jan 19, 2023 at 11:54 AM ]
So when certain guys like 49AT blame Jimmy for not getting us a super bowl isn't that hypocrisy? It's a team stat. Me, I think the defense could've played better but at the end of the day Jimmy had his chances and failed. It is his L. Right?
[ Edited by ItsX4Number6 on Jan 19, 2023 at 11:59 AM ]
Of course it's a QB stat.

Also, game winning drives and super bowl wins are a QB stat. Is there more to the story, of course.

Are wins a HC stat? Yessir.
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
So when certain guys like 49AT blame Jimmy for not getting us a super bowl isn't that hypocrisy? It's a team stat. Me, I think the defense could've played better but at the end of the day Jimmy had his chances and failed. It is his L. Right?

The argument is not whether it's a stat, it's whether it's a good one. It's annoying when posters dismiss any conversation about the stat's value by saying "well it IS a stat."

Most posters know it IS a stat. A good portion of us think it's a dumb stat.

Major League Baseball analysts have majorly discredited Wins for pitchers as a good stat. I feel the same way about wins for pitchers as I do for quarterbacks.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
The argument is not whether it's a stat, it's whether it's a good one. It's annoying when posters dismiss any conversation about the stat's value by saying "well it IS a stat."

Most posters know it IS a stat. A good portion of us think it's a dumb stat.

Major League Baseball analysts have majorly discredited Wins for pitchers as a good stat. I feel the same way about wins for pitchers as I do for quarterbacks.

ehhh this ignores and kind of whitewashes the fact there are more than a few posters that have specifically claimed it's NOT a QB stat. it might not have been you but this debate definitely existed.
Originally posted by boast:
ehhh this ignores and kind of whitewashes the fact there are more than a few posters that have specifically claimed it's NOT a QB stat. it might not have been you but this debate definitely existed.

This lol
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
The argument is not whether it's a stat, it's whether it's a good one. It's annoying when posters dismiss any conversation about the stat's value by saying "well it IS a stat."

Most posters know it IS a stat. A good portion of us think it's a dumb stat.

Major League Baseball analysts have majorly discredited Wins for pitchers as a good stat. I feel the same way about wins for pitchers as I do for quarterbacks.

You nailed it. I think it's known by all that the QB is not solely responsible. No one would claim that Brock walks out there single handed and gets the dub 1 v 11 lol.. maybe in fantasy but we all know that's not reality. So ppl who say the QB isn't solely responsible.. no bleep we all know that. The stat is what it is. How many games were won or lost with this QB starting. Gotta take it for what it is with all the context and nuance involved.
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
So when certain guys like 49AT blame Jimmy for not getting us a super bowl isn't that hypocrisy? It's a team stat. Me, I think the defense could've played better but at the end of the day Jimmy had his chances and failed. It is his L. Right?
It's only contradicting like that for you, since you want to use/assign W/L as an individual stat
[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Jan 19, 2023 at 12:09 PM ]
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by ItsX4Number6:
So when certain guys like 49AT blame Jimmy for not getting us a super bowl isn't that hypocrisy? It's a team stat. Me, I think the defense could've played better but at the end of the day Jimmy had his chances and failed. It is his L. Right?
It's only contradicting like that for you, since you want to use/assign W/L as an individual stat

And I pin the game on Jimmy. You on the other hand blame Jimmy for nearly everything then claim it's a team game the next breath. It's why you have nearly 4000 post in the oast QB thread but 80 in the Bosa thread.

Because it's a QB driven sport. Plain and simple.
I am kinda shocked that people are leaning more yes versus solid no.

You really don't see that in other forums...... I stand corrected from when I said people don't give w/l record to the QB.... it appears at least here they do.

I still think that is a terrible practice and makes no sense to give a W or a l to a sole player because of all the variables....but I was I was clearly wrong to believe that most posters saw it that way.
Originally posted by Dshearn:
I am kinda shocked that people are leaning more yes versus solid no.

You really don't see that in other forums...... I stand corrected from when I said people don't give w/l record to the QB.... it appears at least here they do.

I still think that is a terrible practice and makes no sense to give a W or a l to a sole player because of all the variables....but I was I was clearly wrong to believe that most posters saw it that way.

The NFL does .. just google or wikipedia.. this is an actual wikipedia page:

The following is a list of the top National Football League (NFL) quarterbacks in regular season wins. In the NFL, the starting quarterback is the only position that is credited with records of wins and losses.

The wikipedia page is titled List of NFL career QB win leaders.

On wikipedia, anyone in the world can write anything they want on any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Yes QB is involved in your wins. Which is why Brock Purdy and Jimmy G can do it. While a long string of QB's in that same system have not been able to do it.

People getting triggered by pointing out that Brock wins games seems so weird.

Lol you mean Jimmy. Brocks been awesome and has contributed a lot in that area.

Is it a stat for QBs? Sure, but it's deeper than that. If it that mattered that much, Tebow would be still playing and same with Sanchez. If you wanna argue that Trent Dilfer or Brad Johnson was the reason for their respective teams success than you don't understand what you're talking about it.

Peyton Manning and Mark Sanchez aren't the same lol.

But the most recent argument took place in the Brock thread but you are probably correct that Jimmy Feels were probably at the root of the triggering.

It is just one of many stats that can be looked at. No one stat should be used as an all telling measure for a qb. No one stat can really be used to say two QBs are the same.
Jimmy and Kyle winning together was one reason to keep Jimmy around for Trey's first year.
Share 49ersWebzone