There are 166 users in the forums

Joe Montana or Steve Young?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Joe Montana or Steve Young?

Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Joe was the best QB in football, and even with that Joe made mistakes. Joe was Human, a very lucky human....but human.

I say lucky for the very reason you pointed out. His perfect Super Bowl record. Joe threw a game ending interceptions in both the Cincy Superbowls that were soft throws that hit the defenders right between the numbers...only to be dropped. Those passes looked like they would be picked 9 out of 10 times. Late game as they were, the 49ers where dangerously close to loosing the big game, because of a Joe Montana mistake.

Not to mention when we talk about Joe and Steve....we are really talking about Jerry Rice. This is the guy who makes this whole thing a conversation. There is pre-Jerry offense and their is post Jerry offense.

When you say /impeccable timing and calm under pressure.......that was not always the case.

Let's look at the Playoffs

81-84

2168 yards 7.8 YPA 17tds 11ints

It was in this era that Walsh thought Joe (Who flirted with a 5% interception ratio) needed to be changed and tried to trade for John Elway.

85-87

503 yards 5.7 YPA 0tds 4 ints

When we look at the first 6 years of Joe Montana's 9 years in the playoffs with the 49ers we are talking about a guy with 17 touchdowns and 15 interceptions.

The 49ers had some insane teams, and some of the best defenses the 49ers have ever seen.....but....Joe could be Hot or Joe could be Cold.

In 86 Jerry really started to become the Jerry Rice we remember, and from 88 and beyond he dominated the post season. Jerry Rice is why we remember Joe Cool, and why we stick Steve Young in these all time QB lists.

In 88 Craig went off, and the ground game flourished. Craig went from a 200 carry a season HB/FB to a 300 carry a season back.

88-90

2088 yards 9 YPA 22tds 2 ints

When people talk about Joe Cool, or "fundamentally perfect" they are mostly remembering this 3 year span... the Jerry Rice version of Joe Montana. They (and you) are right. Montana and that offense was near perfect in those years. It was Transcendent.

It really is not that different when people remember Tom Brady as the best ever. Maybe he is, but damn....he had ALOT of help. Just like Joe had a lot of help. Neither are perfect, both made a lot of mistakes along the way and both got pretty darn lucky to become the legends they are.

You love Joe, I love Joe....we all love Joe. I am not nocking the guy, just saying he was not always perfect..... people that said he was a system QB are not really wrong. He was a system QB. I don't think you could drop Joe on any team and the NFL would remember him the way it does.

That dropped interception in the 2nd Bengals SB wasn't going to be game losing. There was plenty of game left. It just would've made it tougher. Esiason might have thrown a pick 6 on the next possession for all anyone knows, so you can't play that game. Part of the pressure of the SB is seizing those opportunities, and Lewis Billups couldn't do it. Having a career 127.8 passer rating across the 4 biggest games of your career isn't lucky. Some people choke under pressure. Most everyone else finds a way to calm their nerves enough to perform. Very, very few actually elevate their games in those situations, and Montana had that ability, maybe more so than anyone in NFL history.

fair enough,

Joe had a career 127.8 superbowl passer rating....

and

Steve Young had a 134.8 superbowl passer rating....

Heck...

Phil Simms has a 150.9 superbowl passer rating...

My point in that is let's not give Joe and Steve all the credit for Jerry Rice.

Joe Montana has a 112.6 passer rating in superbowls without Jerry Rice

As I am sure we all recall, Steve Young went 3 and out against the Chargers when Jerry was on the sidelines.

At some point every season, there is a make or break game...it could be the final game of the playoffs, it could be the superbowl. The point is there is pressure. No doubt Joe rises to the occasion in the superbowl, just like Steve did.

But

So does Jerry Rice.....
Joe is God
Steve was a better physical QB, but overall Joe Montana was stone cold blooded assassin. He like Patrick Mahomes could see things we normal people just can't see. There could be a pole that was painted, one tiny little speck most wouldn't pay attention to, but for some strange reason Joe or Patrick would notice it. You can't teach that, you're born with it.
Originally posted by Dshearn:
fair enough,

Joe had a career 127.8 superbowl passer rating....

and

Steve Young had a 134.8 superbowl passer rating....

Heck...

Phil Simms has a 150.9 superbowl passer rating...

My point in that is let's not give Joe and Steve all the credit for Jerry Rice.

Joe Montana has a 112.6 passer rating in superbowls without Jerry Rice

As I am sure we all recall, Steve Young went 3 and out against the Chargers when Jerry was on the sidelines.

At some point every season, there is a make or break game...it could be the final game of the playoffs, it could be the superbowl. The point is there is pressure. No doubt Joe rises to the occasion in the superbowl, just like Steve did.

But

So does Jerry Rice.....

lol Steve Young and Phil Simms each made 1 career SB start. Not a great counterpoint.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
fair enough,

Joe had a career 127.8 superbowl passer rating....

and

Steve Young had a 134.8 superbowl passer rating....

Heck...

Phil Simms has a 150.9 superbowl passer rating...

My point in that is let's not give Joe and Steve all the credit for Jerry Rice.

Joe Montana has a 112.6 passer rating in superbowls without Jerry Rice

As I am sure we all recall, Steve Young went 3 and out against the Chargers when Jerry was on the sidelines.

At some point every season, there is a make or break game...it could be the final game of the playoffs, it could be the superbowl. The point is there is pressure. No doubt Joe rises to the occasion in the superbowl, just like Steve did.

But

So does Jerry Rice.....

lol Steve Young and Phil Simms each made 1 career SB start. Not a great counterpoint.

A horrible counterpoint. Sample size muchhhhhhh. This guy is reaching, I kind of feel sorry for him and his flawed arguments. He's completely wrong and that's OK. Please keep in mind, Joe Montana did NOT have Jerry Rice or John Taylor or Brent Jones in his first two Super Bowls.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
fair enough,

Joe had a career 127.8 superbowl passer rating....

and

Steve Young had a 134.8 superbowl passer rating....

Heck...

Phil Simms has a 150.9 superbowl passer rating...

My point in that is let's not give Joe and Steve all the credit for Jerry Rice.

Joe Montana has a 112.6 passer rating in superbowls without Jerry Rice

As I am sure we all recall, Steve Young went 3 and out against the Chargers when Jerry was on the sidelines.

At some point every season, there is a make or break game...it could be the final game of the playoffs, it could be the superbowl. The point is there is pressure. No doubt Joe rises to the occasion in the superbowl, just like Steve did.

But

So does Jerry Rice.....

lol Steve Young and Phil Simms each made 1 career SB start. Not a great counterpoint.

Hold up......

Move the goal post much?

You said... those 4 games for Montana was an example one of the few QBs that would not choke in that situation.

Young was in that situation as well....and he didn't choke.

Did the teams Montana was on get to the Superbowl more often?

Hell yes, they were better teams compared to the rest of the NFC. He had more opportunity.

I'm old

Montana is my 49er QB. I am not bagging on the guy, I love the dude. I am actually typing this on desk with an Autographed Jersey and Ball sitting above me.

I would take him over Young as I eluded in my first post, unless I was building a team from scratch....and soley based on durability..

If he played on the 49ers today...this forum would give him absolute hell. That is an absolute FACT.

The dude had 17tds and 15 interceptions in his first 6 post seasons, this forum would treat him like Jimmy G. He was not always clutch, he was not always magic. He made mistakes, and sometimes the dude got lucky.

Anyways, I think we have typed all we can type on this for this decade, we can circle the bases and continue to not agree on it sometime in the next 5 years.

You think Montana is great

I think Montana is great

We all think Montana is great, I don't really think we have much of a disagreement in the grand scheme of things.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,790
This might be sacrilege to say, but comparing Joe to Steve is like comparing Brady to Manning. Steve (like Manning) seemed like he had complete control of the offense. Knew how to audible change up plays. You knew he was putting his guys in the right spots that's why he always had a high completion rate and QB rating. BUT….like Manning, when Steve's play went down (primarily in the playoffs for both players), he went down hard. He would fall apart and in essence his teams would go down with him. It's why you have seasons where in the playoffs he puts up monster numbers in one game followed by an atrocious effort the following week. Manning also crashed and burned like him in the playoffs as well.

Montana and Brady however just had that 'it' factor. Didn't matter how good or bad the game was going, you knew if you gave those guys just once chance at the end, you were screwed. No one could do it like either of them, not even Mahomes.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Young also should have had a 3rd turnover that was overturned in one of the most egregious (and forgotten) bad calls in playoff history. He threw a backwards pass to Terry Kirby at his feet that was picked up by a Falcon and returned for a touchdown, only to have the refs first incorrectly say the Falcons player was down by contact, and then change that call to say Kirby had possession of the fumble and was down by contact. The game would have been 21-0 and instead the 49ers kept possession and scored a touchdown making it 14-7. It really was ugly stuff that game.

I remember this vividly! I think it was Chuck Smith who ran it back before it was overturned. At 21-0 with no Hearst and a FAST falcons defense that gave us fits in the November matchup on turf and that January game… it's likely over.

I watched that early ass game with family. I really remember one of my uncles really stressing how we got away with a terrible officiating call. Iirc chandler threw a pick and we squandered a chance to tie it, adding a FG.

but I think going into the half at 14-instead of 21-0 we felt it was our game to win. That loss really stung for years. Steve didn't have his best day after what was otherwise probably his best season outside of 94.
Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Obviously Joe but if Steve had that 80s team - I can bet he wins 2-3 Superbowls minimum.

lol no Steve choked in the post season often. it's more likely to say Joe would have more if he was the QB in 92 and 93.

This times a million. Getting rid of Joe lost this team 2 additional superbowls. Steve needed a bought team to get over the hump.

Joe all day every day and it's not even close.
Steve's competition was greenbay and dallas at their peaks with two HOF QBs and a couple all time great defenders as well. Joe was dope but lets not pretend that the niners, dallas and greenbay of the 90s wouldnt beat the piss out of cincy and cocky ass dan marino like a drum too
Originally posted by hondakillerzx:
Steve's competition was greenbay and dallas at their peaks with two HOF QBs and a couple all time great defenders as well. Joe was dope but lets not pretend that the niners, dallas and greenbay of the 90s wouldnt beat the piss out of cincy and cocky ass dan marino like a drum too

We don't have to pretend bc Favre was not that good in the playoffs. He consistently choked and threw way too many game killing ints. He only won a SB bc of a special teamer that got MVP. With a number 1 D. Marino would of lit up Dallas and GB.

Also, Montana had to go thru juggernauts like the Bears, Giants, Washington year after year.
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Hold up......

Move the goal post much?

You said... those 4 games for Montana was an example one of the few QBs that would not choke in that situation.

Young was in that situation as well....and he didn't choke.

Did the teams Montana was on get to the Superbowl more often?

Hell yes, they were better teams compared to the rest of the NFC. He had more opportunity.

I'm old

Montana is my 49er QB. I am not bagging on the guy, I love the dude. I am actually typing this on desk with an Autographed Jersey and Ball sitting above me.

I would take him over Young as I eluded in my first post, unless I was building a team from scratch....and soley based on durability..

If he played on the 49ers today...this forum would give him absolute hell. That is an absolute FACT.

The dude had 17tds and 15 interceptions in his first 6 post seasons, this forum would treat him like Jimmy G. He was not always clutch, he was not always magic. He made mistakes, and sometimes the dude got lucky.

Anyways, I think we have typed all we can type on this for this decade, we can circle the bases and continue to not agree on it sometime in the next 5 years.

You think Montana is great

I think Montana is great

We all think Montana is great, I don't really think we have much of a disagreement in the grand scheme of things.

One game is not a good sample size, especially compared to 4. Doug Williams had a fantastic SB performance, but nobody would rank him among the best QB ever because of it. Montana proved his legendary ability to perform under the greatest pressure 4 different times, which is undeniable.

You're the one trying to say Montana was lucky, and he was the product of the Walsh system and having Jerry Rice. I think that puts us in a pretty big disagreement. My point is, you don't get lucky over a 4 Super Bowl span.
Originally posted by elguapo:
A horrible counterpoint. Sample size muchhhhhhh. This guy is reaching, I kind of feel sorry for him and his flawed arguments. He's completely wrong and that's OK. Please keep in mind, Joe Montana did NOT have Jerry Rice or John Taylor or Brent Jones in his first two Super Bowls.

Or Roger Craig for the first. Which is possibly more important because at wr they had Dwight Clark. But at rb they had Ricky Patton. Here is a link for those who don't remember him.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Patton

Patton had bounced around and would last another year or so. By 84 the team was being transformed.

It really doesn't matter, but I still mark Joe as the greatest. Unlike Brady he didn't have to have the games given to him by rule changes and refereeing. I love Steve but definitely a step below Joe.
Originally posted by hondakillerzx:
Steve's competition was greenbay and dallas at their peaks with two HOF QBs and a couple all time great defenders as well. Joe was dope but lets not pretend that the niners, dallas and greenbay of the 90s wouldnt beat the piss out of cincy and cocky ass dan marino like a drum too

One could argue that had Joe stayed in SF, Aikman would not be a HOF QB. He doesn't win 3 SBs if Joe stays, which likely means he doesn't make the HOF.
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by elguapo:
A horrible counterpoint. Sample size muchhhhhhh. This guy is reaching, I kind of feel sorry for him and his flawed arguments. He's completely wrong and that's OK. Please keep in mind, Joe Montana did NOT have Jerry Rice or John Taylor or Brent Jones in his first two Super Bowls.

Or Roger Craig for the first. Which is possibly more important because at wr they had Dwight Clark. But at rb they had Ricky Patton. Here is a link for those who don't remember him.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricky_Patton

Patton had bounced around and would last another year or so. By 84 the team was being transformed.

It really doesn't matter, but I still mark Joe as the greatest. Unlike Brady he didn't have to have the games given to him by rule changes and refereeing. I love Steve but definitely a step below Joe.

100% agree English. People should really do a little research before posting. The offensive players Montana had in 81 and 84 weren't that good at all compared to what some of the greatest quarterbacks had at their disposal. (Craig was great, also my favorite player of all time) Also, the skilled players were nothing in Montanas first 2 SBs, absolutely nothing compared to what Steve Young had for his whole career
Share 49ersWebzone