What is the minimum that you would accept to trade Trey Lance?

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Sickaa:
They'd be lucky to get anything more than a 2nd for him at this point.

It's much better to keep hold of hiim for now In hope that he reaches his full potential.

The only reason you trade him now is if they firmly believe that playing him would only further reduce his value...ala Zach Wilson.

Exactly!

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
How did Purdy's potential get explored last year? We've played at least 2 QBs in 5/6 seasons of KS's tenure and at least 3 in 4/6, so it's more likely than not that all 3 QBs will start games this year.

That's recency bias. In the 71 year history of the Niners before Jimmy got here, who can break a foot or roll an ankle tripping over an empty paper gator aid cup on the sideline, we played more than 2 quarterbacks 8 times, or 11 percent. And those were mostly the days before we put skirts on our qb's, and people teed off on them every down. Most teams don't have that problem these days.

2 2nd's or mid-round first.

He will end up going to. Houston for their 2nd and 4tb. They have extra picks and can go all D in firatm
.They know Trey can improve with playing time and can afford to let him grow with the team.

We use the 2nd on a RT or TE. Then grab Haener QB in the 4th

Originally posted by jobiwon:
He will end up going to. Houston for their 2nd and 4tb. They have extra picks and can go all D in firatm
.They know Trey can improve with playing time and can afford to let him grow with the team.

We use the 2nd on a RT or TE. Then grab Haener QB in the 4th

All of this!!!!

It would be a dream if this happened.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
He will end up going to. Houston for their 2nd and 4tb. They have extra picks and can go all D in firatm
.They know Trey can improve with playing time and can afford to let him grow with the team.

We use the 2nd on a RT or TE. Then grab Haener QB in the 4th

All of this!!!!

It would be a dream if this happened.

I'm on board.

Originally posted by TD49ers:
He is more valuable to the 49ers than what we would get in draft picks.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
He will end up going to. Houston for their 2nd and 4tb. They have extra picks and can go all D in firatm
.They know Trey can improve with playing time and can afford to let him grow with the team.

We use the 2nd on a RT or TE. Then grab Haener QB in the 4th

All of this!!!!

It would be a dream if this happened.

I'm on board.

Haener & Kyle don't seem like a great match.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by jobiwon:
He will end up going to. Houston for their 2nd and 4tb. They have extra picks and can go all D in firatm
.They know Trey can improve with playing time and can afford to let him grow with the team.

We use the 2nd on a RT or TE. Then grab Haener QB in the 4th

All of this!!!!

It would be a dream if this happened.

I'm on board.

That deal would basically be a low round 1st and low round 3rd right? Yea thats not bad. I would go de and rt.

And fill out the rest of the draft the same way.

Is houston willing to drop mills? Maybe a 1st and mills.

Still need qb depth by the bay.

The way I see it is what offer is good enough for Kyle to take the risk of him looking like an idiot? Because so many things can go wrong for them with trading Trey and not much good. There is not really any advantage to them trading Trey. It cost more to trade him than to keep him, Brock is is currently not healthy. They invested so much draft capital on Trey. And there is the risk of him being elite. So what will have Kyle sleep well at night? Knowing all the risks that come with trading him? There is no negative in having Trey on the roster.

Originally posted by JTB1974:

The way I see it is what offer is good enough for Kyle to take the risk of him looking like an idiot? Because so many things can go wrong for them with trading Trey and not much good. There is not really any advantage to them trading Trey. It cost more to trade him than to keep him, Brock is is currently not healthy. They invested so much draft capital on Trey. And there is the risk of him being elite. So what will have Kyle sleep well at night? Knowing all the risks that come with trading him? There is no negative in having Trey on the roster.

Trust the people that saw him everyday. If they thought there was a chance of him becoming elite, none of this would be happening

Originally posted by JTB1974:
The way I see it is what offer is good enough for Kyle to take the risk of him looking like an idiot? Because so many things can go wrong for them with trading Trey and not much good. There is not really any advantage to them trading Trey. It cost more to trade him than to keep him, Brock is is currently not healthy. They invested so much draft capital on Trey. And there is the risk of him being elite. So what will have Kyle sleep well at night? Knowing all the risks that come with trading him? There is no negative in having Trey on the roster.

You don't think our staff already does?

We can deal him for a 2nd rounder. But probably won't do it.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
How did Purdy's potential get explored last year? We've played at least 2 QBs in 5/6 seasons of KS's tenure and at least 3 in 4/6, so it's more likely than not that all 3 QBs will start games this year.

That's recency bias. In the 71 year history of the Niners before Jimmy got here, who can break a foot or roll an ankle tripping over an empty paper gator aid cup on the sideline, we played more than 2 quarterbacks 8 times, or 11 percent. And those were mostly the days before we put skirts on our qb's, and people teed off on them every down. Most teams don't have that problem these days.

It's not recency bias when this has all occurred under the same regime. It's not only the recency of the data that makes it relevant.

I look at it this way. Trey Lance is 22 years old. He is one year old than Bryce Young and CJ Stroud. Sure, you could argue that Bryce and Stroud are better than Trey at this moment, which is a stretch in my opinion. That being said, if you're telling me that you'd want Anthony Richardson or Will Levis over him, you're crazy imo. Both of those QB's have a chance to be taken in the top 15-20 in the draft. If I'm trading Trey Lance, I would want one of those top 20 picks AT THE MINIMUM.