Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Darnold lol showing how taking care of the football, is done
That or he's scared s**tless to throw it and keeps dumping it off. Lol
I think tank, he knows he has a rep for turning it over, so it is a point of emphasis, he may be working to keep those down more than anything. So you may be correct. But progress is progress, that seems like his weak spot and he's working at it.
Honest question man, do you read camp reports or just what's posted here?
Several guys talked about how few aggressive throws Sam has attempted in camp. Even the Raiders reporters noted it during these two practices.
Less turnovers is great of course but if you're just playing captain checkdown and you've been called "greatest thrower of the football"…feels like you're not using your abilities as well as you could.
I've said it before and I'll say it again here: there is such a thing as throwing too few interceptions, because it means you're not taking enough chances. 2 TDs and 0 INTs is great. But 3 TDs and 1 INT is better than 1 TD and 0 INT except in games where your run game utterly dominates.
Even passer rating agrees:
30-40, 3oo yards, 1 TD, 0 INT: 104.2
30-40, 3oo yards, 3 TD, 1 INT:110.4.
And while passer rating isn't exactly a measure of QB performance alone, it IS a pretty good measure of team passing game performance, and you are probably winning more games with the latter stats than the former. That's part of why the 96 Packers won the Super Bowl and we didn't
(Young 4.4 TD%, 1.9 INT% [league leading]; Favre 7.2 TD%, 2.4 INT%). And it's why the 2001 Ram got there and we didn't
(Garcia, 6.3 TD%, 2.4 INT%; Warner, 6.6 TD%, 4.0 INT%). Ask Aaron Rodgers how not throwing interceptions is going for him, with his one ring — incidentally the one year they won a Super Bowl his INT% was the second highest it has been since then.