Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
My point was to say that you shouldn't rely on one reporter/writer/TV personality/former player/podcaster or what have you… and believe whatever they say as undeniably true.
Schefter was always someone I believed to be a credible reporter, but I believe recently it's been well documented that he's just as capable of reporting misinformation as much as he reports true information. I believe you have to think this way about Schefter now, as opposed to believing everything he reports is true.
I listen to Lombardi, as well as Cohn, and all of the 49ers content creators. Most of the time I think Cohn is just posting stuff for clicks, but every once and awhile I think he says something a lot of 49ers reporters are afraid to say.
Does that mean I think highly of Cohn? Absolutely not.
So just because you usually don't like Rich Madrid's opinions, that doesn't mean everything he says is wrong.
I definitely agree with what you're saying in general… especially about using multiple sources, and the idea that someone who may be wrong often can be right at times as well.
I'm just saying in regards to Schefter, if he's reporting something you can believe he heard it from a credible source. Why the information was given to him is a different question. You can see people rejecting this simply because Schefter may report something people don't want to hear, or he's offering an opinion that ended up incorrect. What isn't happening is Schefter is making up reports because he has an axe to grind (example: negative reporting about Lance because he's mad that he didn't accurately predict the 49ers would draft him. Just sheer nonsense.)
Right, and I acknowledge I probably didn't choose my words correctly last time we spoke about this, but I'm not sure what warrants a credible source in this case.
If Schefter goes back to the source that told him the 49ers were all in on Mac Jones, and then posts another report about the 49ers feelings about Trey from that same source(I'm guessing in this case), is Schefter not biased from who he chooses to get his information from?
I understand he's not giving his personal opinion, but doesn't a reporter have the responsibility to protect his reputation by vetting his sources? Even if that source is an Owner of an NFL franchise, if that person gives false information, doesn't he have the ability to not work with them?