There are 274 users in the forums

Who will be the Niners new DC?-Rooney Rule Now Applicable

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Who will be the Niners new DC?-Rooney Rule Now Applicable

Feb 23, 2024 at 3:35 PM
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by battletowin:
whats with the ulbrick talk, wouldn't it be a lateral move for him and Jets can block it?

This is what I don't get.

If we can just poach someone's DC, why not go all the way and hire Schwartz? Matter of fact let's go steal Spags! He loves our QB!
The current team would have to allow it,the Browns have done some really stupid s**t but can't imagine they do such a thing.

Browns can't block it if it is a promotion. The assistant HC title would be one…
Assistant HC doesn't count.
Feb 23, 2024 at 3:37 PM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 62,181
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by battletowin:
whats with the ulbrick talk, wouldn't it be a lateral move for him and Jets can block it?

This is what I don't get.

If we can just poach someone's DC, why not go all the way and hire Schwartz? Matter of fact let's go steal Spags! He loves our QB!
The current team would have to allow it,the Browns have done some really stupid s**t but can't imagine they do such a thing.

Browns can't block it if it is a promotion. The assistant HC title would be one…
Assistant HC doesn't count.

Can we add Pool and Spa technician to it, will that work?
Feb 23, 2024 at 5:31 PM
Originally posted by DrEll:
Browns can't block it if it is a promotion. The assistant HC title would be one…

Assistant HC is an an honorary title that is given to an experienced assistant but is not recognized by the NFL as a valid promotion.
Feb 23, 2024 at 6:06 PM
Originally posted by 49erFaithfullest:
Has Bill Bellicheat been anounced as the DC yet?


dude isn't coaching this yr, especially as a DC. He's eyeing HC gigs next yr and helping his son out
Feb 23, 2024 at 6:24 PM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 62,181
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithfullest:
Has Bill Bellicheat been anounced as the DC yet?


dude isn't coaching this yr, especially as a DC. He's eyeing HC gigs next yr and helping his son out

Mike Vrabel it is.
Feb 23, 2024 at 6:28 PM
I guess we have to wait until Monday most likely, that is unless the name of the hire drops tomorrow.
Feb 23, 2024 at 7:54 PM
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).
[ Edited by Fanaticofnfl on Feb 23, 2024 at 7:54 PM ]
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:02 PM
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,027
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).

I think Kyle thought we would win the SB and that would justify keeping Wilks around. There was no contingency plan even though for good portions of the season it was evident Wilks was not a good fit. Now that we lost to a half assed Kansas City team, Kyle is scrambling to put the pieces together. We lost a good GM to Washington, and a handful of coaches to other teams. Anything outside a big splash proven candidate will look suspect at best. This is just bad news all around….
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:04 PM
Originally posted by DrEll:
I think Kyle thought we would win the SB and that would justify keeping Wilks around. There was no contingency plan even though for good portions of the season it was evident Wilks was not a good fit. Now that we lost to a half assed Kansas City team, Kyle is scrambling to put the pieces together. We lost a good GM to Washington, and a handful of coaches to other teams. Anything outside a big splash proven candidate will look suspect at best. This is just bad news all around….

Lmfao
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:28 PM
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).
Be pretty hard to downgrade from WIlks and his soft coverages.
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:29 PM
  • bud49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,364
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).

I think Kyle thought we would win the SB and that would justify keeping Wilks around. There was no contingency plan even though for good portions of the season it was evident Wilks was not a good fit. Now that we lost to a half assed Kansas City team, Kyle is scrambling to put the pieces together. We lost a good GM to Washington, and a handful of coaches to other teams. Anything outside a big splash proven candidate will look suspect at best. This is just bad news all around….

Wilks was gone after the Superbowl no matter the outcome. Kyle and him never meshed and the D never meshed with him either. And the replacement will be from the inside.
[ Edited by bud49 on Feb 23, 2024 at 8:29 PM ]
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:37 PM
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).

I think Kyle thought we would win the SB and that would justify keeping Wilks around. There was no contingency plan even though for good portions of the season it was evident Wilks was not a good fit. Now that we lost to a half assed Kansas City team, Kyle is scrambling to put the pieces together. We lost a good GM to Washington, and a handful of coaches to other teams. Anything outside a big splash proven candidate will look suspect at best. This is just bad news all around….

Wilks was gone after the Superbowl no matter the outcome. Kyle and him never meshed and the D never meshed with him either. And the replacement will be from the inside.
If the replacement comes from the inside after all these guys were passed over last year for Wilks that'll be underwhelming to say the least.

And if it's coming from the inside what's the hold up supposedly those interviews have been completed.
Feb 23, 2024 at 8:38 PM
  • bud49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,364
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by bud49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Okay yup. I'm officially concerned. There is zero reason to not have this done by now.

We really fired Wilks three days after the Super Bowl with no solid plan Either we didn't have a replacement in mind (which is ridiculous) or our #1 choice fell through (which means probable downgrade).

I think Kyle thought we would win the SB and that would justify keeping Wilks around. There was no contingency plan even though for good portions of the season it was evident Wilks was not a good fit. Now that we lost to a half assed Kansas City team, Kyle is scrambling to put the pieces together. We lost a good GM to Washington, and a handful of coaches to other teams. Anything outside a big splash proven candidate will look suspect at best. This is just bad news all around….

Wilks was gone after the Superbowl no matter the outcome. Kyle and him never meshed and the D never meshed with him either. And the replacement will be from the inside.
If the replacement comes from the inside after all these guys were passed over last year for Wilks that'll be underwhelming to say the least.

And if it's coming from the inside what's the hold up supposedly those interviews have been completed.

I think that because of the time it is taking to hire a DC. Hey I want to be wrong here. But for the love of god I sure don't want Staley.
[ Edited by bud49 on Feb 23, 2024 at 8:39 PM ]
Feb 23, 2024 at 9:50 PM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 62,181
Originally posted by bud49:
I think that because of the time it is taking to hire a DC. Hey I want to be wrong here. But for the love of god I sure don't want Staley.

Honestly I'd take Staley over Wilks and that just might be the case. Not that I'm advocating for it, my guy is Vrabel, but why don't you want Staley? People can look to LAC and how he ran that place, but Staley wouldn't be in charge in SF. So what's to worry??
Feb 23, 2024 at 10:13 PM
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
If the replacement comes from the inside after all these guys were passed over last year for Wilks that'll be underwhelming to say the least.

And if it's coming from the inside what's the hold up supposedly those interviews have been completed.

Be careful I was told that Kyle should take his time to get it right when I stated the same thought,"what the heck is the hold up" it ain`t rocket science!
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone