There are 251 users in the forums
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
If this is about my convo with NY, I want to state again that I trust that NY heard what he heard. I do not trust the podcaster that NY heard say it.
For example, if my kid came home from school and said "someone told me aliens are coming". I would trust my kid that someone told him that. But my immediate question would be "who told you that?"
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
If this is about my convo with NY, I want to state again that I trust that NY heard what he heard. I do not trust the podcaster that NY heard say it.
For example, if my kid came home from school and said "someone told me aliens are coming". I would trust my kid that someone told him that. But my immediate question would be "who told you that?"
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
If this is about my convo with NY, I want to state again that I trust that NY heard what he heard. I do not trust the podcaster that NY heard say it.
For example, if my kid came home from school and said "someone told me aliens are coming". I would trust my kid that someone told him that. But my immediate question would be "who told you that?"
Aliens are coming? Time to hide.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
If this is about my convo with NY, I want to state again that I trust that NY heard what he heard. I do not trust the podcaster that NY heard say it.
For example, if my kid came home from school and said "someone told me aliens are coming". I would trust my kid that someone told him that. But my immediate question would be "who told you that?"
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
Basically…
"THANKSGIVING, 2009…
" Four in a row? No boy is capable of that, bro, but maybe you are! Show me how you're going to make your big pistol shoot twice more tonight! ", Ruiz dares Eddie. After all this intense physical effort, Eddie feels like he needs a bit of a rest. So he lays down on his back as Ruiz straddles his fighting hole, a large grin crossing his gravy-coated crayon feasting face. " Let's see how long these fools can last with me riding them intensely! ". With that, he pushes himself down slowly on the curtainrods, impaling himself like a torturee on a giant pillar of iron. From this angle, rangecoach Cabelin can see how his shaft can literally push itself a whole furlong inside on the downstrokes and matriculate out several inches on the upstrokes with each shot of hot lead. Ruiz's cantelopes are swaying in his face with the wind as he checks which way the breeze blows, so he doesn't miss twice the opportunity to munch on them. Eddie is slumbering away, Ruiz s riding them like a bull and ever louder moans are filling the room as he thinks of her. 'Thank God Ms. Kate Machoca isn't around tonight!' She had a sleepover at a friend's house. We must say that her threat to make Ruiz shoot faster was very well founded. After barely fifteen minutes, he can feel a huge ball tighten around the barrel as he fills his gun's insides with spray after spray of thick CLP! Despite it being his fourth time cleaning his weapon, he can still managed to fieldstrip over a dozen huge wads of one-dollar bills! The final wads of cash are the most painful, as his fingers are sucked dry of their essence by another Machoca, that will NOT be bribed at the armoury. Luckily, he can reload a 9mm in record time since his ball-type ammunition is not only huge, but also produce death hundreds of time faster than an average handgrenade from Antioch! 'Rrrrah!!!"
Amen.
[ -The Book of Armaments, ch. 9, verses 7-23]
On October 2, 1994 future US Marine Sergeant Arianna Acosta (Lippert) was born in Hawaii as the 49ers payed the Eagles at Candlestick scoerd 8-40, so YOU can read this. 🫨🧐
Originally posted by SFATeflonDon:
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by pillageDatazz:
Nick Sorensen legion of boom catalyst and turn over specialist.
— Crant (@CrantGohn) March 2, 2024
Brandon Staley gets the chance to help Sorensen and Shanahan and resurrect his career.
I like this new 3 headed monster. 👏 pic.twitter.com/eEamPK8Quk
Not liking that Cohn is all in on this
That's Gohn, not Cohn.
The not annoying one.
Originally posted by DrEll:
Exactly. Everyone celebrating like we got our top choice SB here we come. They skipped Sorensen last year, then went after all their top candidates before settling on him. Not inspiring at all. And obviously Staley didn't blow them away with his interview, but they thought let's just add him to the mix for no reason.
Its a s**t show all around, but fans think this was a great achievement
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Folks will make up s**t to sound credible. It the way of the Webzone
If this is about my convo with NY, I want to state again that I trust that NY heard what he heard. I do not trust the podcaster that NY heard say it.
For example, if my kid came home from school and said "someone told me aliens are coming". I would trust my kid that someone told him that. But my immediate question would be "who told you that?"
Originally posted by thl408:
It takes more than "trust me bro" for me to believe things that seem privy only to coaches in the meeting room. It's too bad you don't remember but my guess is whichever podcaster you heard it from was speaking out their ass. I mean seriously, which podcaster would know this type of specific information about how it was Sorenson doing the gameplan and not Wilks?
btw, I don't mean you're the one saying "trust me bro", I'm saying this about the podcaster.
Originally posted by thl408:
And the reason why I wanted verification on the, "It was reported that Sorensen and Kyle were the guys game planning the defense for the SB (not Wilks)." statement, is that in the biggest game of the year, if Kyle leaned on Sorenson to gameplan against KC, then that speaks volumes towards the trust that Kyle has in Sorenson.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by thl408:
And the reason why I wanted verification on the, "It was reported that Sorensen and Kyle were the guys game planning the defense for the SB (not Wilks)." statement, is that in the biggest game of the year, if Kyle leaned on Sorenson to gameplan against KC, then that speaks volumes towards the trust that Kyle has in Sorenson.
And that's what I gathered from that comment. Not that wilks is a dummy and can't do his job. Again I don't have total verification…so you can take what I heard with a massive grain of salt and that's okay.
when someone calls me a liar that's when I have a problem.
