Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
Lol. Do you just have dumb takes on purpose to every topic? I find it hard to believe you can be so dense
Ever heard of group think?
[ Edited by glorydayz on Sep 4, 2024 at 12:13 PM ]
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
Lol. Do you just have dumb takes on purpose to every topic? I find it hard to believe you can be so dense
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
+ Show all quotes
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
So the serial killer who killed 25 people and put them in shallow graves along the river bank should be let out? Because it's a "short term fix?"
[ Edited by SanDiego49er on Sep 4, 2024 at 12:38 PM ]
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
+ Show all quotes
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
So the serial killer who killed 25 people and put them in shallow graves along the river bank should be let out? Because it's a "short term fix?"
Ted Bundy would have loved to re-enter society. LOL
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
+ Show all quotes
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
So the serial killer who killed 25 people and put them in shallow graves along the river bank should be let out? Because it's a "short term fix?"
Ted Bundy would have loved to re-enter society. LOL
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
+ Show all quotes
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
Put a bullet in him and be done with it. Then bill the family for the cost of the bullet
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
+ Show all quotes
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
Put a bullet in him and be done with it. Then bill the family for the cost of the bullet
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
+ Show all quotes
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
So the serial killer who killed 25 people and put them in shallow graves along the river bank should be let out? Because it's a "short term fix?"
If thats what the folks who get paid to make those decisions feel should happen, not my profession so I don't know. But you seem to be the professional here.
I don't know too many serial killers that have been allowed to do that though, do you?
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
+ Show all quotes
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
That is a naive fallacy
If history has shown us anything, you can seldom fix dangerous people.....
There are cases when people kill in perceived self defense, or as a mob...that go on to be mostly peaceful... but genreally speaking the risk to society is not worth it....you can't fix murder.
Here is the Recidivism rate nation wide for violent crime
• 62% of male releasees had been returned to prison, compared to 47% of females;
• 63% of Blacks had been reincarcerated compared to 59% of Whites and 60% of Hispanics;
• 30.7% had returned to prison a year after release, 48.6% by year three and 60.7% by year ten.
California does not even report 10 year trends, but in a state that has a "don't care" about muggins, theft approach....they have 45% return to prison with-in 3 years on all criminals...not just the violent like the Fed report shows.....So that is anyone that has gone to jail.
I am in my 50s, and there has ALWAYS been games played with those numbers to make it appear like there is LESS crime then there is, and there has always been bad batches of people that do not care to follow societies rules.....you can't fix that.....no one can.
Even Iceland, a VERY tiny country that is statistically proven to be the safest country on earth has a 29% Recidivism rate after one year.
You can go country by country across the entire WORLD.....no one can fix people that do not give a damn about their fellow man. The numbers world wide are remarkably similar.... You can't work it out of the in Russia, you can't beat it out of them in Asia, and you can't educate it out of them in the west.....what has proven to work....is kill them, or lock them up until they are super old. hitting 70-80 years old is the only thing that really fixes stupid and evil. When they stand a real chance of being beaten to death trying to rob and hurt others..they tend to chill out a bit.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
I don't think such choices should be left to the victims.
Not confident in the CA justice system that justice will be actually served here. Kind of a joke. Should be tried as an adult...I doubt that happens.
Just curious.
Why do you think he should be tried as an adult?
Because he tried to rob and kill somebody.
And that is adult behavior?
When you are 17 it should be tried as an adult. He's not 12.
So in your opinion a 17 year old girl should be fair game if she dresses like an adult? I mean she's almost there, she's 17.
More importantly, how does trying a minor as an adult help Ricky? Using the system as a weapon against those we don't like is just as bad as what this kid did to Ricky.
Your first paragraph response is a laughable joke. It doesn't have anything to do with anything here. Just a dumb point that makes no point.
Second paragraph is dumb too. He tried to strong arm rob somebody. Shot him through and through and tried to kill him. For a watch. Should be tried as an adult.
An adult crime should be tried as an adult. It is not like he shoplifted baseball cards.
What is an adult crime?
Attempted murder would be one
Makes no sense.
I'm so glad Ricky didn't lose his life to this young dumbass kid. No one would care as the focus would simply shift to revenge. How would this help Ricky though? Ricky is the victim here. So if Ricky said let him walk should the DA still charge the kid?
Do you think parents should get the sentence when minors commit a violent crime?
You keep throwing the word revenge. Who mentioned revenge? I think you're confusing justice for revenge
+ Show all quotes
Part of justice means PUNISHMENT (it's not about revenge) and KEEPING this person AWAY from society (he is a grave danger). That's what he's missing. If there is no punishment what is to prevent people from committing crimes all day long?
Keeping a person away from society is a short term fix. Making someone is prepared to re-enter society is the long term answer.
That is a naive fallacy
If history has shown us anything, you can seldom fix dangerous people.....
There are cases when people kill in perceived self defense, or as a mob...that go on to be mostly peaceful... but genreally speaking the risk to society is not worth it....you can't fix murder.
Here is the Recidivism rate nation wide for violent crime
• 62% of male releasees had been returned to prison, compared to 47% of females;
• 63% of Blacks had been reincarcerated compared to 59% of Whites and 60% of Hispanics;
• 30.7% had returned to prison a year after release, 48.6% by year three and 60.7% by year ten.
California does not even report 10 year trends, but in a state that has a "don't care" about muggins, theft approach....they have 45% return to prison with-in 3 years on all criminals...not just the violent like the Fed report shows.....So that is anyone that has gone to jail.
I am in my 50s, and there has ALWAYS been games played with those numbers to make it appear like there is LESS crime then there is, and there has always been bad batches of people that do not care to follow societies rules.....you can't fix that.....no one can.
Even Iceland, a VERY tiny country that is statistically proven to be the safest country on earth has a 29% Recidivism rate after one year.
You can go country by country across the entire WORLD.....no one can fix people that do not give a damn about their fellow man. The numbers world wide are remarkably similar.... You can't work it out of the in Russia, you can't beat it out of them in Asia, and you can't educate it out of them in the west.....what has proven to work....is kill them, or lock them up until they are super old. hitting 70-80 years old is the only thing that really fixes stupid and evil. When they stand a real chance of being beaten to death trying to rob and hurt others..they tend to chill out a bit.
