Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Great example there. Mick Evans is 6'5" 231 lbs. Gee I wonder how he is getting open against 5'9" 180 lb. CB's? I can't imagine. Could it be the 8 inches if height, longer arm reach, big hands, muscle and 50+ lbs. he out weighs them by? I'm sure it can't be that. He ran 4.53. Which is hardly slow for a guy of his size. It's excellent at that size.
Adams was largely a possession WR with Green Bay and Rodgers for a lot of his career. He would run great routes and get you the first down. 6'1" 212 lbs. is hardly small and bigger than many DB's he would go against. 4.51 isn't really that slow. Yeah they would occasionally send him deep. Some of those would even get under thrown. Back shoulder throws. He made a whole career on that. If you get the catch and way down the field it doesn't matter how. Of course he would on occasion beat somebody deep too.
If it's all about size why is every TE lineup vs CBs on the outside? His 40 time was in the 40% percentile.
Adams ran a 4.56 & he's an excellent downfield catcher. You act like the only way you can be looked at as a downfield WR is if that's all you can do? Do gets 180 targets a yr. He can do everything and can lineup anywhere.
Speed for a WR matters, but it's a bit overrated by the public. Speed matters more at CB, they're the ones that have to react to what a WR does.
there's a f**k ton of "fast" WRs that don't do s**t in the NFL. Deebo has one of the highest Y/R in the NfL right now, no on is calling him a speed freak.
understanding coverages, play calling, being able to win off the LOS, route running, having a QB that actually pushes the ball downfield matter much more than just speed as far as being a "downfield" threat goes
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Nov 8, 2024 at 3:45 PM ]