Originally posted by Heroism:
His age is definitely a con but also a pro. He's ready to go day 1. His route running is advanced and shows years of honed craft...
On the con side: he's going to be almost 30 when it's time for his first contract.
I could be wrong on this, there is a very high chance I am misremembering this...but I think I had read that an older player will cost "less" during his peak physical years then a younger player of equal quality.
It was something having to do with normal contract lengths and extensions pushing more controlled money into a players physical peak
maybe I am thinking of basketball...who knows...well....somebody knows...is there any silver lining from a money stand point? Outside of simply not paying someone to sit on the bench for 2 years before they finish puberty?