Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Can't wait for Darnold to get blasted and exposed instantly in the playoffs (where he has literally never even take a snap, btw) and we can move on from this discussion lol
Called it!
There are 317 users in the forums
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Can't wait for Darnold to get blasted and exposed instantly in the playoffs (where he has literally never even take a snap, btw) and we can move on from this discussion lol
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Some people don't know ball
I love the two sides approach you guys take. You have half the guys saying Darnold is s**t and not worth the headache. The other half says he's too good and will command more than 40 million per.
If he was having a monster game, the latter would be out trashing this thread with claims of Darnold being too good as a stop gap bc he's going to demand 50mil per year.
But he's having a s**t game, so the first group is out saying he was always trash.
the reality: you're watching the essence of a stop gap quarterback. Someone that can play, but needs a LOT of help to accomplish anything. In the meantime you look for your future franchise quarterback through the draft.
this is only an option, as Larry Krueger pointed out, if Brock's contract demands are ludicrous. But something tells me you guys are ok with paying Brock 60-65 mil per year
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Can't wait for Darnold to get blasted and exposed instantly in the playoffs (where he has literally never even take a snap, btw) and we can move on from this discussion lol
Called it!
Originally posted by mayo49:Would you pay $50M for Dirty Purdy or $35M for Darnold?
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Can't wait for Darnold to get blasted and exposed instantly in the playoffs (where he has literally never even take a snap, btw) and we can move on from this discussion lol
Called it!
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Would you pay $50M for Dirty Purdy or $35M for Darnold?
Purdy, no brainer. The number doesn't matter to me at all.
Originally posted by Silky:
Just goes to show you don't get caught up in the hype of certain players and teams. It happens every year. Hell even Case Keenum won the Vikes a couple playoff games during his little hot year. How many times do we need to watch this scenario unfold. People crowned Darnold in week 2 after they beat us. Brock had a bit of a down year, but hes got that dawg in him and actually came through in some playoff games. Darnold hasn't done sh*t and all of a sudden he's better than Brock. Get outta here
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Can't wait for Darnold to get blasted and exposed instantly in the playoffs (where he has literally never even take a snap, btw) and we can move on from this discussion lol
Called it!
His receivers were locked up. He had no chance with that OL, they were punked. He doesn't run so he was a sitting duck back there.
Originally posted by pdc20:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Would you pay $50M for Dirty Purdy or $35M for Darnold?
You give 50 millions to Purdy before his agent tells him that another team is willing to give him 55.
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by pdc20:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Would you pay $50M for Dirty Purdy or $35M for Darnold?
You give 50 millions to Purdy before his agent tells him that another team is willing to give him 55.
lol this.
If Purdy is seriously willing to take $50M your reaction if you're the front office should be "for how many years? Let's sign this thing right now!" because right now, that's a bargain. He'll probably get $60M minimum unless he's willing to do us a favor.