2008-09 San Antonio Spurs Thread

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by GameOver:
Just wanted to say it felt good to pancake you the way we did this afternoon at home...thats revenge for what you and Sir Roger did to us a week or so ago...another great game tho...that I enjoyed...

Damn, man. So it was another quarter long drought. That was a huge problem for the Spurs during last year's playoffs. They always had that one quarter every game they lost where they would brick everything.

Pop needs to address this. It's not like they don't have sharp shooters on the bench. It's weird, they ALL go cold.

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
I was in the air during the game. What happened?

Spurs fell asleep in the 3rd quarter and lost.

Really? Maybe if the Lakers were a tranquilizer gun.

The Lakers have a better starting 5, a better bench, and better coaching. That's what happened

Except for when the Spurs won the last time. That was because of luck, right?

Yeah, because I use luck to defend all Laker losses . Any team is capable of winning any night regardless of luck. The Spurs legitimately beat the Lakers at home in a nail biter. The Lakers were short-handed though, and today at full health, they dismembered the Spurs. There was no falling asleep, the Lakers are a better team with distinct advantages. In a seven game series I say Lakers win 4, Spurs win 2.

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
I was in the air during the game. What happened?

Spurs fell asleep in the 3rd quarter and lost.

Really? Maybe if the Lakers were a tranquilizer gun.

The Lakers have a better starting 5, a better bench, and better coaching. That's what happened

Except for when the Spurs won the last time. That was because of luck, right?

Yeah, because I use luck to defend all Laker losses . Any team is capable of winning any night regardless of luck. The Spurs legitimately beat the Lakers at home in a nail biter. The Lakers were short-handed though, and today at full health, they dismembered the Spurs. There was no falling asleep, the Lakers are a better team with distinct advantages. In a seven game series I say Lakers win 4, Spurs win 2.

Spurs would be very fortunate to win two, IMO.

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by AmpLee:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
I was in the air during the game. What happened?

Spurs fell asleep in the 3rd quarter and lost.

Really? Maybe if the Lakers were a tranquilizer gun.

The Lakers have a better starting 5, a better bench, and better coaching. That's what happened

Except for when the Spurs won the last time. That was because of luck, right?

Yeah, because I use luck to defend all Laker losses . Any team is capable of winning any night regardless of luck. The Spurs legitimately beat the Lakers at home in a nail biter. The Lakers were short-handed though, and today at full health, they dismembered the Spurs. There was no falling asleep, the Lakers are a better team with distinct advantages. In a seven game series I say Lakers win 4, Spurs win 2.

Spurs would be very fortunate to win two, IMO.

Quiet, you!

Originally posted by socalfan21:
The reason the the Spurs lost...


Matt Bonner is a starter on the Spurs...

Odom, Ariza and Farmar are bench players on the Lakers...

need I say more?

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by socalfan21:
The reason the the Spurs lost...


Matt Bonner is a starter on the Spurs...

Odom, Ariza and Farmar are bench players on the Lakers...

need I say more?

I've seen you post that one in a few different team threads, this year. You have yet to be wrong when posting it.

Originally posted by TX9R:
After living in AZ a few years, I can honestly say I never get tired of seeing the Spurs stick it to them. I've won countless dollars because of this.

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by TX9R:
After living in AZ a few years, I can honestly say I never get tired of seeing the Spurs stick it to them. I've won countless dollars because of this.

Hahaha. Parker/Duncan pick & roll vs. Nash/Shaq pick and roll defense is easy money.

Originally posted by Joecool:
The Spurs are to The Suns as the Lakers were to the Kings.

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
The Spurs are to The Suns as the Lakers were to the Kings.

Haha, definitely. Manu owns the Suns.

Originally posted by TheSixthRing:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
The Spurs are to The Suns as the Lakers were to the Kings.

Haha, definitely. Manu owns the Suns.

baldness owns Manu

Originally posted by TX9R:

Originally posted by TheSixthRing:

Originally posted by pantstickle:

Originally posted by Joecool:
The Spurs are to The Suns as the Lakers were to the Kings.

Haha, definitely. Manu owns the Suns.

baldness owns Manu

I'm sure all his rings and millions make it not seem so bad