There are 257 users in the forums
King-Shaq?
Jun 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM
- vrabbit
- Veteran
- Posts: 35,953
Jun 14, 2009 at 12:03 PM
- SacRock14
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,746
I understand Cleveland's thought process -- they've got to do whatever they can to show LeBron they are serious. But I don't think Shaq is the answer.
For Ben Wallace and Pavlovic though, it's not exactly a big risk.
For Ben Wallace and Pavlovic though, it's not exactly a big risk.
Jun 14, 2009 at 12:06 PM
- lazy
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,687
Do it!
Jun 14, 2009 at 12:17 PM
- socalfan21
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,635
Originally posted by SacRock14:
I understand Cleveland's thought process -- they've got to do whatever they can to show LeBron they are serious. But I don't think Shaq is the answer.
For Ben Wallace and Pavlovic though, it's not exactly a big risk.
Agreed.
Jun 14, 2009 at 12:49 PM
- LA9erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,021
Stern would cream in his pants at the prospect of Kobe versus Shaq AND LeBron in the Finals. Make it happen, Darth Stern.
Jun 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
- NFL Pick 'em
Makes sense to me. 
Jun 14, 2009 at 1:06 PM
- WheresWaldo
- Member
- Posts: 2,440
Originally posted by SacRock14:
I understand Cleveland's thought process -- they've got to do whatever they can to show LeBron they are serious. But I don't think Shaq is the answer.
For Ben Wallace and Pavlovic though, it's not exactly a big risk.
Shaq for Wallace and Pavlovic is basically giving you Shaq for free. Shaq is a greater offensive threat than Ben Wallace who can't score if his life depended on it. Shaq is just as good defensively. Pavolivic helped Cleveland in the beginning and middle of the season, but fell off towards the end. This is a no-brainer.
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM
- 1251alex
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,432
"LeBron never won one without Shaq." 
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:38 PM
- babyshaq90
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,315
I wanna watch Kazaam now!
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:39 PM
- ea_thegreat
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,374
Originally posted by 1251alex:
"LeBron never won one without Shaq."
true but shaq was the better player in LA with kobe while Lebron would be better than Shaq. In the end the trade should help them but they still need another player that can create their own shot.
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:42 PM
- 1251alex
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,432
Originally posted by Thizz415:Originally posted by 1251alex:
"LeBron never won one without Shaq."
true but shaq was the better player in LA with kobe while Lebron would be better than Shaq. In the end the trade should help them but they still need another player that can create their own shot.
Hedo? That would be a hell of a scary team. Lebron-Shaq-Turkoglu
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
They should have done this at the trading deadline.
Jun 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM
- HoneyBadger49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,054
Originally posted by crzy:
They should have done this at the trading deadline.
Jun 14, 2009 at 5:28 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
- NFL Pick 'em
I heard on the radio today that the Warriors are a potential player in the Shaq trade-fest.
Jun 14, 2009 at 5:36 PM
- Fhysical
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,183
Originally posted by King49er:Originally posted by crzy:
They should have done this at the trading deadline.
That would have been too logical.