Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
I WANT to say 1st, but I agree with you.
There are 231 users in the forums
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
I WANT to say 1st, but I agree with you.
Originally posted by skeetskeet:Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
I WANT to say 1st, but I agree with you.
He'll get in on name alone, but honestly, you can make a strong case that he isn't a HoFamer. Though I think he gets in eventually but shouldn't be the first few years
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:Originally posted by skeetskeet:Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
I WANT to say 1st, but I agree with you.
He'll get in on name alone, but honestly, you can make a strong case that he isn't a HoFamer. Though I think he gets in eventually but shouldn't be the first few years
This. Really he is a just a great defensive player and average hitter. Catchers get a bonus for longevity I guess.
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:Originally posted by skeetskeet:Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I will go with HOF eventually. Not a 1st ballot for me though.
I WANT to say 1st, but I agree with you.
He'll get in on name alone, but honestly, you can make a strong case that he isn't a HoFamer. Though I think he gets in eventually but shouldn't be the first few years
This. Really he is a just a great defensive player and average hitter. Catchers get a bonus for longevity I guess.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I think he is better than just an average hitter. He has a .284 lifetime batting average over 15 years which, for a catcher, is pretty elite. It certainly wouldnt be enough to get him in the HOF if he wasn't great defensively but he is one of the best behind the plate. Plus, a career of that many years with just one team is pretty special in today's world
Originally posted by Niners99:Weve never seen a catcher get in primarily because of defense before. Its usually guys like Piazza, Carter, Fisk, etc.
I think he gets in eventually, but it'll take a long time. Defensive ability is a reputation that ends up fading in peoples minds, and there will be a whole generation of great hitters that will be in line ahead of him.
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I think he is better than just an average hitter. He has a .284 lifetime batting average over 15 years which, for a catcher, is pretty elite. It certainly wouldnt be enough to get him in the HOF if he wasn't great defensively but he is one of the best behind the plate. Plus, a career of that many years with just one team is pretty special in today's world
no player should get credit that another position doesnt get. Bottom line is you could name 50 players who were wayyy better hitters than Yadi not in the HOF.
Originally posted by Niners99:
Weve never seen a catcher get in primarily because of defense before. Its usually guys like Piazza, Carter, Fisk, etc.
I think he gets in eventually, but it'll take a long time. Defensive ability is a reputation that ends up fading in peoples minds, and there will be a whole generation of great hitters that will be in line ahead of him.
Well its the HOF. It doesnt have to be about hitting only. If Yadi's defense was that elite that it made that much of an impact, which I think you can say, then maybe its time to recognize defense if the career has that kind of longevity. He has plenty of hardware to back it up.
I think he is well respected. I don't think it will take as long as you think. I think he gets in pretty easy after a couple years.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I disagee on this one Rubs. Catching everyday like Yadi has done for 15 years takes a huge toll. Obviously catchers numbers arent going to be the same as 1B numbers. In my opinion, SS and C are the 2 positions where defense should be highly considered along with the offensive numbers. Ozzie Smith as a .262 hitter and is in the HOF. Voters certainly took his position and his defense into consideration.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I disagee on this one Rubs. Catching everyday like Yadi has done for 15 years takes a huge toll. Obviously catchers numbers arent going to be the same as 1B numbers. In my opinion, SS and C are the 2 positions where defense should be highly considered along with the offensive numbers. Ozzie Smith as a .262 hitter and is in the HOF. Voters certainly took his position and his defense into consideration.
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I disagee on this one Rubs. Catching everyday like Yadi has done for 15 years takes a huge toll. Obviously catchers numbers arent going to be the same as 1B numbers. In my opinion, SS and C are the 2 positions where defense should be highly considered along with the offensive numbers. Ozzie Smith as a .262 hitter and is in the HOF. Voters certainly took his position and his defense into consideration.
Then why did Piazza have such great numbers? He played forever also. You are just giving him a pass because he caught, when there are actually a lot of catchers in the HOF with solid offensive numbers.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by Rubberneck36:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I disagee on this one Rubs. Catching everyday like Yadi has done for 15 years takes a huge toll. Obviously catchers numbers arent going to be the same as 1B numbers. In my opinion, SS and C are the 2 positions where defense should be highly considered along with the offensive numbers. Ozzie Smith as a .262 hitter and is in the HOF. Voters certainly took his position and his defense into consideration.
Then why did Piazza have such great numbers? He played forever also. You are just giving him a pass because he caught, when there are actually a lot of catchers in the HOF with solid offensive numbers.
ROIDS OBVIOUSLY
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Then why did Piazza have such great numbers? He played forever also. You are just giving him a pass because he caught, when there are actually a lot of catchers in the HOF with solid offensive numbers.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by Rubberneck36:Then why did Piazza have such great numbers? He played forever also. You are just giving him a pass because he caught, when there are actually a lot of catchers in the HOF with solid offensive numbers.
Not from guys Ive seen play. Only 5 that are in the HOF..... Bench, Fisk, Pudge, Carter, and Piazza. Now, I know you saw Bill Dickey and Mickey Cochrane so you do have more to go by.
Are you actually saying that catching doesnt affect hitting numbers by that statement?
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I disagee on this one Rubs. Catching everyday like Yadi has done for 15 years takes a huge toll. Obviously catchers numbers arent going to be the same as 1B numbers. In my opinion, SS and C are the 2 positions where defense should be highly considered along with the offensive numbers. Ozzie Smith as a .262 hitter and is in the HOF. Voters certainly took his position and his defense into consideration.
Then why did Piazza have such great numbers? He played forever also. You are just giving him a pass because he caught, when there are actually a lot of catchers in the HOF with solid offensive numbers.
ROIDS OBVIOUSLY
Damn, Bench took roids also? and Berra Fisk?