LISTEN: 49ers Midseason Mailbag →

There are 150 users in the forums

Golden State Warriors 2015-16

Nov 18, 2015 at 9:24 AM
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:


thanks sir!
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:19 PM
MVP MVP MVP

"With Steph Curry on the floor Tuesday, 40 percent of the Warriors shots were uncontested. With him off the floor, just 21 percent of the team's looks were uncontested."
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:33 PM
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
MVP MVP MVP

"With Steph Curry on the floor Tuesday, 40 percent of the Warriors shots were uncontested. With him off the floor, just 21 percent of the team's looks were uncontested."

Wow, that's a great stat.

40% is a very high number. Considering most of Curry's shots are contested, he's constantly double and triple teamed, this means most every time he kicks it out he's creating wide open opportunities for others. He demands that much attention. Pick your poison.
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
MVP MVP MVP

"With Steph Curry on the floor Tuesday, 40 percent of the Warriors shots were uncontested. With him off the floor, just 21 percent of the team's looks were uncontested."

Wow, that's a great stat.

40% is a very high number. Considering most of Curry's shots are contested, he's constantly double and triple teamed, this means most every time he kicks it out he's creating wide open opportunities for others. He demands that much attention. Pick your poison.

Yep. The Dubs just need Klay, Draymond,Barnes, and Iggy to be consistent shooters. When 2 of the 4 have hot games to go along with Steph this team cannot lose.
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:45 PM
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Yep. The Dubs just need Klay, Draymond,Barnes, and Iggy to be consistent shooters. When 2 of the 4 have hot games to go along with Steph this team cannot lose.

Agree. Green and Iggy have been shooting it well. Both over 40% on 3's. Barnes and Klay are sub 40% on 3's. Need to bump that number up, especially Klay.
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:47 PM
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.

Not dumb at all, that thought has crossed my mind as well.

Seriously, how much better can this team possible get? They're almost perfectly constructed the way they are. The chemistry is PERFECT.

Having said that, it's hard to say no to Durant. If it's financially possible to bring in him, it has to be explored. I would not want to do it if it meant making drastic changes to the roster.
[ Edited by SofaKing on Nov 18, 2015 at 2:48 PM ]
Nov 18, 2015 at 2:49 PM
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.

I would be more worried about the bench and lack of quality depth. No way you can add Durant to go along with Curry ( when he gets his huge deal), Klay, Draymond and Barnes or Ezeli without seriously hurting the strength of your backups.
Nov 18, 2015 at 4:33 PM
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.

I would be more worried about the bench and lack of quality depth. No way you can add Durant to go along with Curry ( when he gets his huge deal), Klay, Draymond and Barnes or Ezeli without seriously hurting the strength of your backups.

I'm of the thought process that if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Nov 18, 2015 at 5:26 PM
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.

Not dumb at all, that thought has crossed my mind as well.

Seriously, how much better can this team possible get? They're almost perfectly constructed the way they are. The chemistry is PERFECT.

Having said that, it's hard to say no to Durant. If it's financially possible to bring in him, it has to be explored. I would not want to do it if it meant making drastic changes to the roster.

At least it won't be Jed and Trent making the decisions.
Nov 18, 2015 at 5:28 PM
Looks like a strong possibility Paul and Redick will both be out for tomorrows game.
Nov 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
I may sound dumb but I feel like adding Durant would just mess with the chemistry on this team.

Not dumb at all, that thought has crossed my mind as well.

Seriously, how much better can this team possible get? They're almost perfectly constructed the way they are. The chemistry is PERFECT.

Having said that, it's hard to say no to Durant. If it's financially possible to bring in him, it has to be explored. I would not want to do it if it meant making drastic changes to the roster.

At least it won't be Jed and Trent making the decisions.

True lol. I have total confidence this FO will make the right call.
Nov 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Looks like a strong possibility Paul and Redick will both be out for tomorrows game.

Would rather see them healthy and playing so they have no excuses when we spank them on their home court.

But it does increase our odds of winning, so I won't complain.
Nov 18, 2015 at 8:24 PM
Nov 19, 2015 at 9:53 AM
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Looks like a strong possibility Paul and Redick will both be out for tomorrows game.

what's wrong with cp3?

big game 2nite regardless
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone