2017 NBA Off-Season Thread

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by 4ML:

Originally posted by mayo49:

Originally posted by 4ML:

Considering Cavs aren't even willing to trade Love for Melo - I highly doubt they'll trade Kyrie for Melo.

Yeah, but Love wasn't demanding a trade. I think the Cavs sign Rose to replace Kyrie, then swap Kyrie for Melo.

That won't happen. Knicks are having tough time trading Melo for anything half decent. They won't get Kyrie for him. That's absurd talk.

LOL at Kyrie for Melo. Beyond absurd actually.

That's your fanbase dude

Yo sacniner I read a rumor online that Sacramento are offering Fox for Kyrie it might need more players just wondering what's your opinion.

Originally posted by nothing03:
Yo sacniner I read a rumor online that Sacramento are offering Fox for Kyrie it might need more players just wondering what's your opinion.

Sam Amico started that rumor. Dude is a hack. This ain't happening.

Kyrie is locked in for two years, player option for year three. He'll leave for sure.

I am against it because it'll take a lot more than Fox to get this done, and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. Kyrie is a damn beast, but Kyrie, with no one else for two years (we'll have to give up multiple assets) and then what? Start the rebuild over? No thanks... you know

I'm excited to see the young guys develop. Vivek needs to just leave this alone.. also, the kings have gotten robbed on trades recently.

Originally posted by sacniner:

and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Just because a team sucks, doesnt mean they are rebuilding or attempting to rebuild. Look no further than your San Francisco Giants.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Just because a team sucks, doesnt mean they are rebuilding or attempting to rebuild. Look no further than your San Francisco Giants.

ain't my giants. #2002

and im just messing around. i treat my queens with respect

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Just because a team sucks, doesnt mean they are rebuilding or attempting to rebuild. Look no further than your San Francisco Giants.

ain't my giants. #2002

and im just messing around. i treat my queens with respect

Sorry. I just assumed they were.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Just because a team sucks, doesnt mean they are rebuilding or attempting to rebuild. Look no further than your San Francisco Giants.

This. My team has been garbage, but they held on to Boogie and were willing to mortgage their future to be mediocre and be an 8th seed (consequently, get swept in the first round). Funny part, they failed at that.

The Boggie trade signaled full rebuild

WTF HOW HAVE I NEVER SEEN THIS

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by sacniner:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:
and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

what have the other 10 years been considered?

Just because a team sucks, doesnt mean they are rebuilding or attempting to rebuild. Look no further than your San Francisco Giants.

This. My team has been garbage, but they held on to Boogie and were willing to mortgage their future to be mediocre and be an 8th seed (consequently, get swept in the first round). Funny part, they failed at that.

The Boggie trade signaled full rebuild

No, they been in rebuild mode that long, they've just bumbled draft pick after draft pick.

2009: Tyreke over Steph Curry and DeMar DeRozan
2010: DMC (No blame here. Best talent left on the board, but issues of his mentality came to fruition) over Paul George and Gordon Hayward.
2011: Biyombo, traded on draft night. Ended up with Jimmer, lol. Klay and Kawahi still on the board. Got IT 60th but traded him for literal s**t despite flashing talent.
2012: Thomas Robinson. Lillard and Drummond still on the board.
2013: Ben McLamore. Weak draft, but CJ McCollum went 2 picks later.
2014: Stauskas, lol. Warren or LaVine would have been better picks.

'15 draft and up is prolly too young to judge, and obviously hindsight is 20/20, but had they played the draft right they wouldn't 'just start' rebuilding mode, they'd be pushing for a title.

PG: Steph
SG: McCollum
SF: Kawahi
PF: DMC
C: Drummond

im gonna stab someone if we trade wiggins for kyrie

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by sacniner:

and the Kings are finally doing a full rebuild. .

Originally posted by valrod33:
im gonna stab someone if we trade wiggins for kyrie

Cavs should slap themselves for that stupid s**t.

Originally posted by valrod33:

im gonna stab someone if we trade wiggins for kyrie

No you won't.