There are 190 users in the forums

2017 NBA Off-Season Thread

Kyrie is a better player than IT.

I think Kyrie will average around 28-29ppg in Boston and a healthy IT will likely average around 22-23 ppg.

But, Jae Crowder is a really nice addition for Cavs. He's entering his prime and is one of the best 3nD players in the league. He has the size and quickness guard PFs and SGs. That's a great pickup.

Lastly, best thing about this trade - Nets pick. I'm not sure whether Cavs will keep the pick. I think if things aren't going so smoothly in OKC or NOLA - there's a solid chance those team will look to unload PG and Cousins. That's Cavs best opportunity to land another star.
[ Edited by 4ML on Aug 24, 2017 at 3:30 PM ]
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.
Originally posted by 4ML:

I think Kyrie will average around 28-29ppg in Boston and a healthy IT will likely average around 22-23 ppg.

So.....Kyrie will average the exact amount of points that IT averaged last season? Agreed.

But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart.

Thank you. Agreed again.
[ Edited by SteveWallacesHelmet on Aug 24, 2017 at 3:37 PM ]
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

No it isnt better. Because you are speaking for people that you have no idea what they are thinking.

IT outperformed Kyrie in almost every measurable way, and did so without the luxury of playing with one of the best players in NBA history. Kyrie and IT are built from the same mold: outstanding scorers, mediocre distributors, and horrible defenders. THAT is why I said its a lateral move. Because what they bring to the table is the exact same thing.

Kyrie was the better defender by far in 2016-2017 and plenty of stats back that to (DPM, defensive rating with and without them on the floor, etc.). As others have said, Kyrie also has the ability to play defense when he wants to. IT is probably the worst defensive PG in the league and is only going to get worse as he gets older. If I'm the Cavs, I'm letting him walk rather than offering him a max deal next season.

And playing with Lebron did not help Kyrie Irving at all statistically. He had the share the ball with a ball dominant point forward who isn't a great player off ball on offense (because he isn't a good spot up shooter and doesn't slash like he used to). Kyrie got a few open shots from Lebron but he also was given the ball late in possessions and forced to take difficult shots because Lebron dribbled the clock out (how Lebron gets a lot of his assists). Without Lebron, Irving would have had a lot more points and assists.

Thomas's usage and stats are going to take a nosedive this year and eventually he won't be effective enough on the offensive end to offset being a historically bad defender. I can't even imagine how bad he'll be on defense at 33 which is why giving him a long term deal is so scary.

Isaiah Thomas is an afterthought in this trade. The Nets pick is the centerpiece and Crowder has a nice contract for a solid two way wing in his prime. Thomas has an outside shot at being a top 10 PG this season (he was probably the 9th best this year after Paul, Westbrook, Curry, Wall, Lillard, Irving, Conley, and Lowry) and then he could be playing for another team in 2018. He had a great offensive season and a very high usage rate which inflated his PER, but he may have been the worst defensive player at any position in the NBA (Doug McDermott finished last in DRPM among qualitied players but IT was neck and neck with him at -3.89).

In total RPM, Thomas finished 13th among PGs at 1.83 behind Irving at 2.05. And he's just going to get worse.
  • Shifty
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,428
Originally posted by DickWedgie:
Uh why are some Cetics fans burning their IT21 jerseys? Do they not realize this was a trade?

That's an absolute disgrace and embarrassment to burn his jersey. Unbelievable
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Dont mean to come at you specifically, John....but this opinion has been stated in here a few times now, and no one has been able to answer why.

Every bit of "support" one has brought up to back up that claim, has been nothing more than adjectives and stories.

There is not a single shred of tangible/statistical evidence that supports the idea that Kyrie is "way better" than IT. Not a single thing. If people want to say that Kyrie is younger and IT and that is why they prefer him, fine. It is perfectly acceptable to say you prefer one player to the other. But claims that one player is "vastly superior" or "far better" is based on absolutely nothing.

Of course, if someone wants to continue this debate and support their claims with something factual or measurable, I am happy to continue. But so far, not a single person has brought up anything verifiable to support their opinion.


Here's a fact. Kyrie fetched IT, 2 other players and a likely top 3 pick.

If kyrie WASN'T far better it would have been IT and crumbs.

I don't think it's fair or possible to compare the two. As we haven't seen the best of Kyrie.

Kyrie is a drive and drop PG. CLE was set up for Bron to drive and kick.

Kyrie also ain't as bad on defense as the numbers or pundits make him out to be.

CLE coasted all season until the playoffs.
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.

I wasnt talking about 1 year at all. Maybe Steve was but I am looking at the big picture and thinking about a comparison between the 2 players. However, I agree with your assessment. Kyrie will blow Thomas away when talking about the long term.

Reality is Boston wants Kyrie to be a huge part of their organization for years while I seriously doubt Cleveland signs Thomas but instead says bye bye after a year. Then, IT can go play for his 5th NBA team.
[ Edited by Ninerjohn on Aug 24, 2017 at 6:32 PM ]
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.

I wasnt talking about 1 year at all. Maybe Steve was but I am looking at the big picture and thinking about a comparison between the 2 players. However, I agree with your assessment. Kyrie will blow Thomas away when talking about the long term.

Reality is Boston wants Kyrie to be a huge part of their organization for years while I seriously doubt Cleveland signs Thomas but instead says bye bye after a year. Then, IT can go play for his 5th NBA team.

Yea...I agree.

Still can't believe Boston traded IT though. b***h move imo. Glad to have him on Cavs.
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by DickWedgie:
Uh why are some Cetics fans burning their IT21 jerseys? Do they not realize this was a trade?

That's an absolute disgrace and embarrassment to burn his jersey. Unbelievable

They need to burn Ainge's jersey. Every fan base has people of questionable intellect.
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.

I wasnt talking about 1 year at all. Maybe Steve was but I am looking at the big picture and thinking about a comparison between the 2 players. However, I agree with your assessment. Kyrie will blow Thomas away when talking about the long term.

Reality is Boston wants Kyrie to be a huge part of their organization for years while I seriously doubt Cleveland signs Thomas but instead says bye bye after a year. Then, IT can go play for his 5th NBA team.

Yea...I agree.

Still can't believe Boston traded IT though. b***h move imo. Glad to have him on Cavs.

I dont think they had much of a choice if they wanted Kyrie. There was no chance Ainge was going to pay a max deal to the little guy anyway so it made a lot of sense to move him in this trade.
  • jcs
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 38,683
Originally posted by Kalen49ers:
Originally posted by DickWedgie:
Uh why are some Cetics fans burning their IT21 jerseys? Do they not realize this was a trade?

That's an absolute disgrace and embarrassment to burn his jersey. Unbelievable

It's their money who cares...not like they will want to wear that jersey again...
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.

I wasnt talking about 1 year at all. Maybe Steve was but I am looking at the big picture and thinking about a comparison between the 2 players. However, I agree with your assessment. Kyrie will blow Thomas away when talking about the long term.

Reality is Boston wants Kyrie to be a huge part of their organization for years while I seriously doubt Cleveland signs Thomas but instead says bye bye after a year. Then, IT can go play for his 5th NBA team.

Yea...I agree.

Still can't believe Boston traded IT though. b***h move imo. Glad to have him on Cavs.

I dont think they had much of a choice if they wanted Kyrie. There was no chance Ainge was going to pay a max deal to the little guy anyway so it made a lot of sense to move him in this trade.

I get that but after what IT did for them this postseason and offseason. It was kind of a b***h move imho.

I'm a fan of IT. I remember having a discussion with you on him earlier this year. Sad to see Kyrie leave but happy to have him (and Jae Crowder) on the team to replace him. I think Cavs did extremely well.
[ Edited by 4ML on Aug 25, 2017 at 1:35 PM ]
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
But you think the two are a wash and that "point guard for point guard its a lateral move". OK.. there is no NBA exec alive that would ever say that. Better?

I agree. But, if you're only talking about 2017-2018 season - a healthy IT and healthy Kyrie aren't that far apart. I still give the edge to Kyrie. But, in long term - Kyrie will blow IT away.

I wasnt talking about 1 year at all. Maybe Steve was but I am looking at the big picture and thinking about a comparison between the 2 players. However, I agree with your assessment. Kyrie will blow Thomas away when talking about the long term.

Reality is Boston wants Kyrie to be a huge part of their organization for years while I seriously doubt Cleveland signs Thomas but instead says bye bye after a year. Then, IT can go play for his 5th NBA team.

Yea...I agree.

Still can't believe Boston traded IT though. b***h move imo. Glad to have him on Cavs.

I dont think they had much of a choice if they wanted Kyrie. There was no chance Ainge was going to pay a max deal to the little guy anyway so it made a lot of sense to move him in this trade.

I get that but after what IT did for them this postseason and offseason. It was kind of a b***h move imho.

I'm a fan of IT. I remember having a discussion with you on him earlier this year. Sad to see Kyrie leave but happy to have him (and Jae Crowder) on the team to replace him. I think Cavs did extremely well.

I agree that the Cavs did well but mainly because of the #1 pick they will be receiving. I just do not expect IT to be part of their plans beyond next year. This was a good deal for Cleveland and an excellent deal for Boston in my opinion.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I agree that the Cavs did well but mainly because of the #1 pick they will be receiving. I just do not expect IT to be part of their plans beyond next year. This was a good deal for Cleveland and an excellent deal for Boston in my opinion.

Will have to wait and see. If Lebron stays with Cleveland (that's a big if) - they'd resign IT. If he doesn't - they're better off going into rebuild.

The guy finished 5th in the MVP voting for a reason. I'll gladly resign him if he is healthy and puts up another amazing season.
Cleveland-Boston trade might get voided due to IT's hip injury

I'm done. This is the greatest offseason in professional sports history. And we don't even know what's going to happen with Melo yet.
Share 49ersWebzone