Golden State Warriors Talk | Page 46

I don't really follow basketball at all, I mean I've watched the playoffs every now and then when the Warriors or Kings are in, but that's about it. So, I'm curious about this stuff I'm reading that says the Warriors are intentionally tanking this year.

Is this true? And if so, why?

Dec 13, 2019 at 7:19 AM

#682

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
I don't really follow basketball at all, I mean I've watched the playoffs every now and then when the Warriors or Kings are in, but that's about it. So, I'm curious about this stuff I'm reading that says the Warriors are intentionally tanking this year.

Is this true? And if so, why?

It's not true. If it were - it would be to draft the center Wiseman.

[ Edited by mayo49 on Dec 13, 2019 at 2:28 PM ]

Dec 13, 2019 at 7:32 AM

#683

OnTheClock
Hall of Fame
Posts: 37,040

Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
I don't really follow basketball at all, I mean I've watched the playoffs every now and then when the Warriors or Kings are in, but that's about it. So, I'm curious about this stuff I'm reading that says the Warriors are intentionally tanking this year.

Is this true? And if so, why?

It's not true. If they were - it would be to draft the center Wiseman.

So they're legitimately THIS BAD? WOW. HOW?

Dec 13, 2019 at 10:04 AM

#684

SteveWallacesHelmet
Veteran
Posts: 22,464

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
So they're legitimately THIS BAD? WOW. HOW?

Let's try to break this down for you.

How good do you think the Lakers would be if Lebron played 4 games, Anthony Davis played none, their 3rd best player played half the games, their 4th best player played about 1/3 of the games, Dwight Howard played 6 total games, and the Lakers were forced to play with 8-9 total players for an extended stretch?

Dec 13, 2019 at 10:22 AM

#685

DynastyChile
Veteran
Posts: 14,808

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
So they're legitimately THIS BAD? WOW. HOW?

Let's try to break this down for you.

How good do you think the Lakers would be if Lebron played 4 games, Anthony Davis played none, their 3rd best player played half the games, their 4th best player played about 1/3 of the games, Dwight Howard played 6 total games, and the Lakers were forced to play with 8-9 total players for an extended stretch?

This is a non-basketball fan. So this may not make sense. Picture this - how would the Niners be without Garrapolo, Kittle, Bosa, all of our offensive line, no footballs to play with, and to fill the voids you hired the local community college kids to play instead.

Dec 13, 2019 at 11:16 AM

#686

SteveWallacesHelmet
Veteran
Posts: 22,464

Originally posted by DynastyChile:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by OnTheClock:
So they're legitimately THIS BAD? WOW. HOW?

Let's try to break this down for you.

How good do you think the Lakers would be if Lebron played 4 games, Anthony Davis played none, their 3rd best player played half the games, their 4th best player played about 1/3 of the games, Dwight Howard played 6 total games, and the Lakers were forced to play with 8-9 total players for an extended stretch?

This is a non-basketball fan. So this may not make sense. Picture this - how would the Niners be without Garrapolo, Kittle, Bosa, all of our offensive line, no footballs to play with, and to fill the voids you hired the local community college kids to play instead.

Gotcha. I tried. LOL.

Dec 13, 2019 at 4:58 PM

#687