2024 San Francisco Giants Season Thread

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
lol and then he gets a hit. He can stay one more game

Originally posted by TheXFactor:

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
lol and then he gets a hit. He can stay one more game

he's from NY, it's his showing off game

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Agreed about Belt. He has shown much more consistency in recent times. In years past, he would hit .450 over a 2 to 3 week period twice a season, which would average out the 2 to 3 week period twice a season where he would hit .150 or so it seemed.

That's why I always said his season totals of .280 with 18 homeruns were incredibly deceiving.

But, fingers crossed, he seems to be past that.

If you hit .280 with 18 HR, it doesn't really matter how you got there. Belt being in a slump for 6 weeks didn't kill the team, but him being white hot for 2 weeks actually won us games.

I never had an issue with Belt. His injuries were always bad luck that you couldn't fault him for, and when he was hot he was a game changer. Fans were always hard on him because of his body language and awkward looking athleticism. Crawford was equally bad for a good chunk
of time, but nobody cared because he looks cool and plays smooth defense.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Agreed about Belt. He has shown much more consistency in recent times. In years past, he would hit .450 over a 2 to 3 week period twice a season, which would average out the 2 to 3 week period twice a season where he would hit .150 or so it seemed.

That's why I always said his season totals of .280 with 18 homeruns were incredibly deceiving.

But, fingers crossed, he seems to be past that.

If you hit .280 with 18 HR, it doesn't really matter how you got there. Belt being in a slump for 6 weeks didn't kill the team, but him being white hot for 2 weeks actually won us games.

I never had an issue with Belt. His injuries were always bad luck that you couldn't fault him for, and when he was hot he was a game changer. Fans were always hard on him because of his body language and awkward looking athleticism. Crawford was equally bad for a good chunk
of time, but nobody cared because he looks cool and plays smooth defense.

Dont agree with this at all, but thats ok.

Originally posted by Garce:
DJ BC Raw

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:

Originally posted by Garce:
DJ BC Raw

I just had 56 members of this thread PM me requesting you stop doing this.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

+1 (but didnt PM)

Originally posted by Garce:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
+1 (but didnt PM)

It's much better to debate belt for the 9900 time.

Originally posted by Garce:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
+1 (but didnt PM)

It's much better to debate belt for the 9900 time.

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:

They Belt debate is the worst and I'd still rather read that than your nicknames

Originally posted by Garce:

Originally posted by Rubberneck36:
They Belt debate is the worst and I'd still rather read that than your nicknames

That's not my nick name, that's what he calls himself. He's the clubhouse DJ. You would know that if you were a real fan