Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Seeing a lot of - If ANT played well - Lakers would lose. Lol he had a bad game bc Vando had him locked up. Lakers shut him down 10 days earlier too in Minny.
Vando is one of the better perimeter defenders in the league. Lakers defense in 4th quarter was legitimately suffocating.
Stop. He missed so many wide open shots. Tons. Ant didnt even need to play well. If he had a D+ game instead of an F, the Wolves win pretty easily.
Then I've to say - you need to watch the game again. ANT had maybe 2-3 opens shots (only 1 completely wide open when the game was over in OT).
Every single ANT possession.
Also - ANT locked up DLo pretty good in that game. I can say the same - if D'Lo had an average game - Lakers win pretty easily. But, there was a reason why D'Lo had a bad game and that was ANT.
I guess where you and I differ is when I say open, I mean space to operate. There were probably 5 or so shots in this clip that you sent that show Ant creating space to get his shot off and then the defender flying in to close out. Those are open shots to me. A late contest is not the same as a defender up in his face.
But yeah your point about D'Lo is valid.