Originally posted by Leathaface:
Although I don't care for Brooks, I didn't think he deserved to be ejected. He appeared to be playing the ball (no pun intended) but was careless and overzealous. Should've been a flagrant 1 at max.
The NBA does such a poor job officiating and it gets exponentially worse in the playoffs because everyone is watching.
Embiid deserved a flagrant 2 and ejection for what he did (clearly unnecessary and excessive) while at the same time Harden didn't deserve a flagrant 2 or ejection. Harden isn't trying to hit the defender below the belt (and I'm not sure he even did). Again flagrant 1 max.
Draymond was obvious - the act itself combined with his history of unsportsmanlike behavior deserved everything he got.
I think Embiid should have def been a flagrant 2. If you're gonna hand out flagrant 2 for Harden and Brooks - then Embiid's was the worst.
Harden one was the weakest. That shouldn't have been a flagrant 2. Brooks probably got ejected bc of what he said before the game and refs wanted some control over a pretty physical game. I think flagrant 1 is probably the right call but I feel this is how NBA wants to rule on groin shots.
…which is why Embiid not getting ejected makes no sense. That was easily the worst of it all.